This webpage contains references on major theories, frameworks, research studies, and issues in digital learning. The vast majority date from the last decade (2014 onwards) but some important older publications, especially books and key articles, are included. Older references may be in older bibliographic formats.
This is a companion page to the more specific Publications on Mobile Learning webpage, which covers mobile-related topics. For references on specific technological tools, including web 1.0, web 2.0 and web 3.0, see the Tools for Digital Learning section of this website. If you spot broken links or would like to suggest additional inclusions, please feel free to contact me.
21st century skills
- Finger, G. (2015). Creativity, visualisation, collaboration and communication. In M. Henderson & G. Romeo (Eds.), Teaching and digital technologies: Big issues and critical questions. Cambridge University Press.
- Henriksen, D., Mishra, P., & Mehta, R. (2015). Novel, effective, whole: Toward a NEW framework for evaluations of creative products. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 23(3), 455-478.
- Jenkins, S., et al. (2016). The shifting paradigm of teaching: Personalized learning according to teachers. KnowledgeWorks/NCTAF.
- Khan, S. (2012). The one world schoolhouse: Education reimagined. Hodder & Stoughton.
- Lonka, K., Makkonen, J., Litmanen, T., Berg, M., Hietajärvi, L., Kruskopf, M., Lammassaari, H., et al. (2017). Road to 21st century competence: Evaluation framework for transversal competences in the Finnish curriculum. Microsoft.
- Robinson, K. (2011). Out of our minds: Learning to be creative (revised ed.). Capstone.
- Stansberry, S., Thompson, P., & Kymes, A. (2015). Teaching creativity in a Master’s level educational technology course. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 23(3), 433-453.
- Teo, T., Unwin, S., Scherer, R., & Gardiner, V. (2021). Initial teacher training for twenty-first century skills in the Fourth Industrial Revolution (IR 4.0): A scoping review. Computers & Education, 170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104223
- Zhao, Y. (2012). World class learners: Educating creative and entrepreneurial students. Corwin.
Adoption (Leadership/Technology acceptance)
- Esawe, A. T., Esawe, K. T., & Esawe, N. T. (2023). Acceptance of the learning management system in the time of COVID-19 pandemic: An application and extension of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model. E-Learning and Digital Media, 20(2), 162-190. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530221107788
- Howard, S.K., & Mozejko, A. (2015). Teachers: Technology, change and resistance. In M. Henderson & G. Romeo (Eds.), Teaching and digital technologies: Big issues and critical questions. Cambridge University Press.
- Joo, Y. J., Park, S., & Lim, E. (2018). Factors influencing preservice teachers’ intention to use technology: TPACK, teacher self-efficacy, and Technology Acceptance Model. Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 48-59. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26458506
- Li, L. (2014). Understanding language teachers’ practice with educational technology: A case from China. System, 46, 105-119.
- Makki, T.W., O’Neal, L.J., Cotton, S.R., & Rikard, R.V. (2018). When first-order barriers are high: A comparison of second- and third-order barriers to classroom computing integration. Computers & Education, 120, 90-97.
- Oakley, G., & Pegrum, M. (2015). Engaging in networked learning: Innovating at the intersection of technology and pedagogy. Education Research and Perspectives, 42, 397-428. http://www.erpjournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/1_ERPV42_Oakley_2015_Engaged-in-Networked-Learning.pdf
- Petko, D., Egger, N., Cantieni, A., & Wespi, B. (2015). Digital media adoption in schools: Bottom-up, top-down, complementary or optional? Computers & Education, 84, 49-61.
- Shachak, A., Kuziemsky, C., & Petersen, C. (2019). Beyond TAM and UTAUT: Future directions for HIT implementation research. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103315
- Schmitz, M.-L., Antonietti, C., Consoli, T., Cattaneo, A., Gonon, P., & Petko, D. (2023). Transformational leadership for technology integration in schools: Empowering teachers to use technology in a more demanding way. Computers & Education, 204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104880
- Tamilmani, K., Rana, N. P., Fosso Wamba, S., & Dwivedi, R. (2021). The extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2): A systematic literature review and theory evaluation. International Journal of Information Management, 57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102269
- Uluyol, Ç., & Şahin, S. (2014). Elementary school teachers’ ICT use in the classroom and their motivators for using ICT. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(1), 65-75.
- van den Breemt, A., & Diepstraten, I. (2016). Teacher perspectives on ICT: A learning ecology approach. Computers & Education, 92-93, 161-170.
AI (Artificial intelligence)
See also: Generative AI (ChatGPT).
See also: Learning analytics.
- Alexander, B. (2019, Oct. 14). 5 AIs in search of a campus. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2019/10/5-ais-in-search-of-a-campus
- Alpaydin, E. (2016). Machine learning: The new AI. MIT Press.
- Andrejevic, M., & Selwyn, N. (2023). Education in an era of pervasive automation. Postdigitital Science and Education, 5, 220-231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-022-00336-x
- Anyoha, R. (2017, Aug. 28). The history of artificial intelligence. Harvard University Science in the News. https://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2017/history-artificial-intelligence
- Aoun, J.E. (2017). Robot-proof: Higher education in the age of artificial intelligence. MIT Press.
- Argenton, G. (2017). Mind the gaps: Controversies about algorithms, learning and trendy knowledge. E-learning and Digital Media [early view].
- Biddle, P. (2017, Jul. 5). AI is making it extremely easy for students to cheat. Wired. https://www.wired.com/story/ai-is-making-it-extremely-easy-for-students-to-cheat/
- Bogost, I. (2018, May). Alexa is a revelation for the blind. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/05/what-alexa-taught-my-father/556874/
- Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford University Press.
- Brockman, J. (Ed.). (2015). What to think about machines that think: Today’s leading thinkers on the age of machine intelligence. Harper Perennial.
- Buolamwini, J. (2023). Unmasking AI: My mission to protect what is human in a world of machines. Penguin Random House.
- Brynjolfsson, E. (2022). The Turing trap: The promise & peril of human-like artificial intelligence. Daedalus, spring. https://www.amacad.org/publication/turing-trap-promise-peril-human-artificial-intelligence
- Buckingham Shum, S. J., & Luckin, R. (2019). Learning analytics and AI: Politics, pedagogy and practices. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 2785-2793. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12880
- Buduma, N., & Lacascio, N. (2017). Fundamentals of deep learning: Designing next-generation machine intelligence algorithms. O’Reilly Media.
- Buriak, J. M., et al. (2023, Feb. 27). Best practices for using AI when writing scientific manuscripts. Caution, care, and consideration: Creative science depends on it. American Chemical Society Publications. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsnano.3c01544
- Calma, J. (2024, Jan. 25). AI and crypto mining are driving up data centers’ energy use. The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2024/1/24/24049047/data-center-ai-crypto-bitcoin-mining-electricity-report-iea
- Calma, J. (2024, May 16). Microsoft’s AI obsession is jeopardizing its climate ambitions. The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2024/5/15/24157496/microsoft-ai-carbon-footprint-greenhouse-gas-emissions-grow-climate-pledge
- Casal-Otero, L., Catala, A., Fernández-Morante, C., Taboada, M., Cebreiro, B., & Barro, S. (2023). AI literacy in K-12: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(29). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00418-7
- Chace, C. (2015). Surviving AI: The promise and peril of artificial intelligence. Three Cs.
- Clark, A., Chen, J., Engelbert, N., & Kathman, B. (2020, Apr. 28). Three corporate voices: Artificial intelligence and machine learning. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/4/three-corporate-voices-artificial-intelligence-and-machine-learning
- Colpaert, J., & Stockwell, G. (Eds.). (2022). Smart CALL: Personalization, contextualization, and socialization. Castledown.
- Couldry, N. (2023, Apr. 11). AI as colonial knowledge production: The resistance begins here. University World News. https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=2023041014520289
- Cox, T. (2018, May 21). Voice control: Why AI must resist our bad habit of stereotyping human speech. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/voice-control-why-ai-must-resist-our-bad-habit-of-stereotyping-human-speech-96310
- Crawford, K. (2021). Atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. Yale University Press.
- Crompton, H., Edmett, A., Ichaporia, N., & Burke, D. (2024). AI and English language teaching: Affordances and challenges. British Journal of Educational Technology [early view]. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13460
- D’Agostino, S. (2024, Feb. 27). Facial recognition heads to class. Will students benefit? Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/tech-innovation/teaching-learning/2024/02/27/facial-recognition-heads-class-will-students
- Danesi, M. (2024). AI in foreign language learning and teaching: Theory and practice. Nova Science.
- Darvishi, A., Khosravi, H., Sadiq, S., Gašević, D., & Siemens, G. (2024). Impact of AI assistance on student agency. Computers & Education, 210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104967
- Davenport, T.H., & Kirby, J. (2016). Only humans need apply: Winners and losers in the age of smart machines. Harper Business.
- Dawson, S., Joksimovic, S., Mills, C., Gašević, D., & Siemens, G. (2023). Editorial. Advancing theory in the age of artificial intelligence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(5), 1051-1056. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13343
- Díaz, B., & Nussbaum, M. (2024). Artificial intelligence for teaching and learning in schools: The need for pedagogical intelligence. Computers & Education, 217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105071
- Eadiccico, L. (2017). Command performance. In K. Kennedy & C. Mifsud (Eds.), Artificial intelligence: The future of humankind. Time.
- Edmett, A., Ichaporia, N., Crompton, H., & Crichton, R. (2023). Artificial intelligence and English language teaching: Preparing for the future. British Council. https://doi.org/10.57884/78EA-3C69
- EDUCAUSE. (2022). Artificial intelligence: Where are we now? Special report. https://er.educause.edu/toc/educause-review-special-report-artificial-intelligence-where-are-we-now
- EDUCAUSE. (2024). Artificial intelligence (AI) [resource collection]. https://library.educause.edu/topics/infrastructure-and-research-technologies/artificial-intelligence-ai
- ELI. (2017). 7 things you should know about … adaptive learning. EDUCAUSE. https://library.educause.edu/resources/2017/1/7-things-you-should-know-about-adaptive-learning
- ELI. (2017). 7 things you should know about … artificial intelligence in teaching and learning. EDUCAUSE. https://library.educause.edu/resources/2017/4/7-things-you-should-know-about-artificial-intelligence-in-teaching-and-learning
- Elish, M.C., & boyd, d. (2018). Situating methods in the magic of big data and AI. Communication Monographs, 85(1), 57-80.
- Elrod, A. G. (2024, Mar. 19). The machine-translated web: Signs of a new educational reality. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2024/3/the-machine-translated-web-signs-of-a-new-educational-reality
- Erdenesanaa, D. (2023, Oct. 11). A.I. could soon need as much electricity as an entire country. The New York Times, p. A8. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/10/climate/ai-could-soon-need-as-much-electricity-as-an-entire-country.html
- Fathi, J., Rahimi, M., & Derakhshan, A. (2024). Improving EFL learners’ speaking skills and willingness to communicate via artificial intelligence-mediated interactions. System, 121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103254
- Fleckenstein, J., Meyer, J., Jansen, T., Keller, S. D., Köller, O., & Möller, J. (2024). Do teachers spot AI? Evaluating the detectability of AI-generated texts among student essays. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100209
- Floreani, S. (2023, 31 May). Yes, you should be worried about AI – but Matrix analogies hide a more insidious threat. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/may/31/yes-you-should-be-worried-about-ai-but-matrix-analogies-hide-a-more-insidious-threat
- Frankish, K., & Ramsey, W.M. (2014). The Cambridge handbook of artificial intelligence. Cambridge University Press.
- Gallagher, M., & Breines, M. (2023). Unpacking the hidden curricula in educational automation: A methodology for ethical praxis. Postdigit Science and Education, 5, 56-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-022-00342-z
- Gebru, T., Bender, E. M., McMillan-Major, A., & Mitchell, M. (2023, Mar. 31). Statement from the listed authors of Stochastic Parrots on the “AI pause” letter. DAIR. https://www.dair-institute.org/blog/letter-statement-March2023
- Georgieva, M., Kassorla, M., & Papini, A. (2024, Oct. 17). AI literacy in teaching and learning: A durable framework for higher education. EDUCAUSE. https://www.educause.edu/content/2024/ai-literacy-in-teaching-and-learning/executive-summary#ExecutiveSummary
- Gibson, R. (2023, Aug. 14). 10 ways artificial intelligence is transforming instructional design. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2023/8/10-ways-artificial-intelligence-is-transforming-instructional-design
- Gibson, R. (2024, Sep. 10). The impact of AI in advancing accessibility for learners with disabilities. The EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2024/9/the-impact-of-ai-in-advancing-accessibility-for-learners-with-disabilities
- Gilliard, C., & Selwyn, N. (2023). Automated surveillance in education. Postdigital Science and Education, 5, 195-205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-022-00295-3
- Godwin-Jones, R. (2023). Emerging spaces for language learning: AI bots, ambient intelligence, and the metaverse. Language Learning & Technology, 27(2), 6-27. https://doi.org//10125/73501
- Goldweic, P., & Getis, V. (2024, Apr. 29). The Canvas chatbot: How Northwestern University built its own AI-enabled tool. The EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2024/4/the-canvas-chatbot-how-northwestern-university-built-its-own-ai-enabled-tool
- Gritsenko, D., Markham, A., Pötzsch, H., & Wijermars, M. (2022). Algorithms, contexts, governance: An introduction to the special issue. New Media & Society, 24(4), 835-844. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221079037
- Harari, Y.N. (2017). Homo deus: A brief history of tomorrow. Vintage.
- Hess, E. (2017, Jun. 19). In the AI age, ‘being smart’ will mean something completely different. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2017/06/in-the-ai-age-being-smart-will-mean-something-completely-different
- Hirai, A., & Kovalyova, A. (2024). Speech-to-text applications’ accuracy in English language learners’ speech transcription. Language Learning & Technology, 28(1), 1-21. https://hdl.handle.net/10125/73555
- Houser, K. (2024, Mar. 30). Does AI need a ‘body’ to become truly intelligent? Meta researchers think so. Freethink. https://www.freethink.com/robots-ai/embodied-ai
- IBM. (2024). What is artificial intelligence (AI)? https://www.ibm.com/topics/artificial-intelligence
- Jeon, J., Lee, S., & Choe, H. (2023). Beyond ChatGPT: A conceptual framework and systematic review of speech-recognition chatbots for language learning. Computers & Education, 206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104898
- Ji, H., Han, I., & Park, S. (2024). Teaching foreign language with conversational AI: Teacher-student-AI interaction. Language Learning & Technology, 28(2), 91-108. https://hdl.handle.net/10125/73573
- Kaku, M. (2014). The future of the mind: The scientific quest to understand, enhance and empower the mind. Penguin.
- Kaplan, J. (2015). Humans need not apply: A guide to wealth and work in the age of artificial intelligence. Yale University Press.
- Kaplan, J. (2016). Artificial intelligence: What everyone needs to know. Oxford University Press.
- Kasparov, G. (2017). Deep thinking: Where machine intelligence ends and human creativity begins. John Murray.
- Katz, M. (2017, Nov. 15). Welcome to the era of the AI co-worker. Wired. https://www.wired.com/story/welcome-to-the-era-of-the-ai-coworker/
- Kim, A., & Su, Y. (2024). How implementing an AI chatbot impacts Korean as a foreign language learners’ willingness to communicate in Korean. System, 122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103256
- Kim, H., Yang, H., Shin, D., & Lee, J. H. (2022). Design principles and architecture of a second language learning chatbot. Language Learning & Technology, 26(1), 1–18. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/73463
- Kissinger, H.A. (2018, Jun.). How the Enlightenment ends. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/06/henry-kissinger-ai-could-mean-the-end-of-human-history/559124/
- Kong, S.-C., Cheung, W. M.-Y., & Zhang, G. (2023). Evaluating an Artificial Intelligence Literacy Programme for Developing University Students’ Conceptual Understanding, Literacy, Empowerment and Ethical Awareness. Educational Technology & Society, 26(1), 16-30. https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.202301_26(1).0002
- Laupichler, M. C., Aster, A., Schirch, J., & Raupach, T. (2022). Artificial intelligence literacy in higher and adult education: A scoping literature review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100101
- Lee, H., & Lee, J. H. (2024). The effects of AI-guided individualized language learning: A meta-analysis. Language Learning & Technology, 28(2), 134-162. https://hdl.handle.net/10125/73575
- Li, K. C. and Wong, B. T.-M. (2023). Artificial intelligence in personalised learning: A bibliometric analysis. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 20(3), 422-445. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-01-2023-0007
- Lin, Y., & Yu, Z. (2024). A bibliometric analysis of artificial intelligence chatbots in educational contexts. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 21(2), 189-213. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-12-2022-0165
- Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1-16). https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3313831.3376727
- Lotherington, H., Pegrum, M., Thumlert, K., Tomin, B., Boreland, T., & Pobuda, T. (2024). Exploring opportunities for language immersion in the posthuman spectrum: Lessons learned from digital agents. Interactive Technology & Smart Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-02-2024-0038
- Luckin, R. (2023, Jul. 14). Yes, AI could profoundly disrupt education. But maybe that’s not a bad thing. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/jul/14/ai-artificial-intelligence-disrupt-education-creativity-critical-thinking
- Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L.B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson. https://www.pearson.com/corporate/about-pearson/innovation/smarter-digital-tools/intelligence-unleashed.html
- Lynch, P. (2016). The internet of us: Knowing more and understanding less in the age of big data. Liveright.
- MacCallum, K., Parsons, D., & Mohaghegh, M. (2023). Identifying the components of foundational Artificial Intelligence (AI) literacy – Early results from a Delphi study. ASCILITE 2023 Conference proceedings: People, partnerships and pedagogies. https://doi.org/10.14742/apubs.2023.672
- Mackenzie, A. (2017). Machine learners: Archaeology of a data practice. MIT Press.
- Marr, B. (2016, Dec. 8). What is the difference between deep learning, machine learning and AI? Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2016/12/08/what-is-the-difference-between-deep-learning-machine-learning-and-ai/
- MathWorks. (2018). Introducing deep learning with MATLAB. https://au.mathworks.com/campaigns/offers/deep-learning-with-matlab.html
- Miller, A. I. (2020). Creativity in the age of AI. American Scientist, 108(4), 244-249.
- Mitchell, M. (2019). Artificial intelligence: A guide for thinking humans. Pelican.
- Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, K. W. S., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). AI literacy: Definition, teaching, evaluation and ethical issues. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 58(1), 504-509. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.487
- Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2. https://10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041
- Ng, D. T. K., Tan, C. W., & Leung, J. K. L. (2024). Empowering student self-regulated learning and scienceeducation through ChatGPT: A pioneering pilot study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(4),1328-1353. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13454
- Ng, D. T. K., Wu, W., Leung, J. K. L., Chiu, T. K., F., & Chu, S. K. W. (2024). Design and validation of the AI literacy questionnaire: The affective, behavioural, cognitive and ethical approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(3), 1082-1104. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13411
- Paolo, G., Gonzalez-Billandon, J., & Kégl, B. (2024). A call for embodied AI. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.03824
- Papagiannis, H. (2017). Augmented human: How technology is shaping the new reality. O’Reilly Media.
- Parloff, R. (2017). The deep-learning revolution. In K. Kennedy & C. Mifsud (Eds.), Artificial intelligence: The future of humankind. Time.
- Pasquale, F. (2020). New laws of robotics: Defending human expertise in the age of AI. Belknap Press.
- Pasquale, F., & Selwyn, N. (2023). Education and the new laws of robotics. Postdigital Science and Education, 5, 206-219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-022-00325-0
- Pelletier, K., et al. (2023). EDUCAUSE Horizon Report: Holistic Student Experience Edition. EDUCAUSE. https://library.educause.edu/resources/2023/10/2023-educause-horizon-report-holistic-student-experience-edition
- Pelletier, K., et al. (2024). EDUCAUSE Horizon Report: Teaching and Learning Edition. EDUCAUSE. https://library.educause.edu/resources/2024/5/2024-educause-horizon-report-teaching-and-learning-edition
- Pullen, J.P. (2017). A lesson in communication. In K. Kennedy & C. Mifsud (Eds.), Artificial intelligence: The future of humankind. Time.
- Rainie, L., & Anderson, J. (2017, Feb. 8). Code-dependent: Pros and cons of the algorithm age. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/2017/02/08/code-dependent-pros-and-cons-of-the-algorithm-age/
- Rainie, L., & Anderson, J. (2017, May 3). The future of jobs and jobs training. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/2017/05/03/the-future-of-jobs-and-jobs-training/
- Rusell, S. (2019). Human compatible: Artificial intelligence and the problem of control. Penguin.
- Russell, S.J., & Norvig, P. Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (3rd ed.). Pearson.
- Sandberg, A. (2015). Ethics of brain emulation. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 26(3), 439-457.
- Schroeder, R. (ongoing). AI in higher education: Metasite. https://sites.google.com/view/ai-highered
- Scoble, R., & Israel, S. (2017). The fourth transformation: How augmented reality and artificial intelligence change everything. Patrick Brewster Press.
- Selwyn, N., Hillman, T., Bergviken-Rensfeldt, A., & Perrotta, C. (2023). Making sense of the digital automation of education. Postdigital Science and Education, 5, 1-14 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-022-00362-9
- Selwyn, N., Hillman, T., Bergviken Rensfeldt, A., & Perrotta, C. (2023). Digital technologies and the automation of education: Key questions and concerns. Postdigitital Science and Education, 5, 15-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00263-3
- Shanahan, M. (2015). The technological singularity. MIT Press.
- Shepherd, T. (2018). AI, the personal, and rights. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A networked self and human augmentics, artificial intelligence, sentience (pp. 187-200). Routledge.
- Siemens, G. (2020, Feb. 24). The post-learning era in higher education: Human + machine. EDUCAUSE Review, 1, pp.60-62. https://er.educause.edu/-/media/files/articles/2020/3/er20_1111.pdf
- Skidelsky, R. (2023). The machine age: An idea, a history, a warning. Allen Lane.
- Smutny, P., & Schreiberova, P. (2020). Chatbots for learning: A review of educational chatbots for the Facebook Messenger. Computers & Education, 151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103862
- Sourati, J., & Evans, J. A. (2023). Accelerating science with human-aware artificial intelligence. Nature Human Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01648-z
- Southworth, J., & Migliaccio, K. (2023). Developing career-ready graduates: The importance of AI literacy across the curriculum. Media & Learning. https://media-and-learning.eu/type/featured-articles/developing-career-ready-graduates-the-importance-of-ai-literacy-across-the-curriculum/
- Staley, D. (2020, Aug. 10). Interface university and other scenarios for the AI economy. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/8/interface-university-and-other-scenarios-for-the-ai-economy
- Suleyman, M. [with Bhaskar, M.] (2023). The coming wave: Technology, power, and the twenty-first century’s greatest dilemma. Crown.
- Tegmark, M. (2017). Life 3.0: Being human in the age of artificial intelligence. Alfred A. Knopf.
- Tonguç, G., & Ozkar, B. O. (2020). Automatic recognition of student emotions from facial expressions during a lecture. Computers & Education, 148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103797
- Turow, J. (2021). The voice catchers: How marketers listen in to exploit your feelings, your privacy, and your wallet. Yale University Press.
- Vincent, J. (2024, Feb. 16). How much electricity does AI consume? The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/24066646/ai-electricity-energy-watts-generative-consumption
- Wang, T., & Cheng, E. C. K. (2022). Towards a tripartite research agenda: A scoping review of artificial intelligence in education research. In E. C. K. Cheng, R. B. Koul, T. Wang & X. Yu (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education: Emerging technologies, models and applications. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol. 104. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7527-0_1
- Wang, Y. (2022). Controversial issues faced by intelligent tutoring system in developing constructivist-learning-based curriculum. In E. C. K. Cheng, R. B. Koul, T. Wang & X. Yu (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education: Emerging technologies, models and applications. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol. 104. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7527-0_22
- Wong, G. K. W., Ma, X., Dillenbourg, P., & Huan, J. (2020). Broadening artificial intelligence education in K-12: Where to start?. ACM Inroads, 11(1), 20-29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3381884
- Wu, R., & Yu, Z. (2023). Do AI chatbots improve students learning outcomes? Evidence from a meta-analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(1), 10-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13334
- Yi, Y. (2021). Establishing the concept of AI literacy: Focusing on competence and purpose. European Journal of Bioethics, 12(2), 353-368. https://doi.org/10.21860/j.12.2.8
- Yu, S., Androsov, A., Yan, H., & Chen, Y. (2024). Bridging computer and education sciences: A systematic review of automated emotion recognition in online learning environments. Computers & Education, 220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105111
- Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (20219). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(39). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
- Zembylas, M. (2023). A decolonial approach to AI in higher education teaching and learning: strategies for undoing the ethics of digital neocolonialism. Learning, Media and Technology, 48(1), 25-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2021.2010094
- Zhang, C., Meng, Y., & Ma, X. (2024). Artificial intelligence in EFL speaking: Impact on enjoyment, anxiety, and willingness to communicate. System, 121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103259
Attention (Information overload/Mindfulness)
See also: Digital wellness.
- Andrejevic, M. (2024, Jan. 16). Protect information systems to preserve attention. Issues in Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.58875/BZHT8695
- Andrews, G. (2020). Keep calm and log on: Your handbook for surviving the digital revolution. MIT Press.
- Berg, M., & Seeber, B. K. (2016). The slow professor: Challenging the culture of speed in the academy. University of Toronto Press.
- Berthon, P. R., & Pitt, L. F. (2019). Types of mindfulness in an age of digital distraction. Business Horizons, 62, 131-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.10.003
- Boulous Walker, M. (2016). Slow philosophy: Reading against the institution. Bloomsbury Academic.
- Bonnardel, V., Biddington, T., May, B., Jones, R., & Roffey, S. (2018). Toward the implementation of contemplative practices in higher education. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 6(3), 3-13.
- boyd, d. (2017, Jan. 6). Hacking the attention economy. Points. https://points.datasociety.net/hacking-the-attention-economy-9fa1daca7a37
- Burkeman, O. (2021). Four thousand weeks. The Bodley Head.
- Bush, M. (2011). Mindfulness in higher education. Contemporary Buddhism, 12(1), 183-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/14639947.2011.564838
- Carr, N. (2010). The shallows: What the internet is doing to our brains. W. W. Norton.
- Castek, J., & Ryoo, J. (2021). Mindfulness and compassion in teacher education. In R. E. Ferdig & K. E. Pytash (Eds.), What teacher educators should have learned from 2020 (pp.53-68). AACE. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/219088/
- Chayka, K. (2024). Filterworld: How algorithms flattened culture. Penguin Random House.
- Chen, Y.-T., Shih, W.-L., Lee, C.-H., Wu, P.-L., & Tsai, C.-Y. (2021). Relationships among undergraduates’ problematic information security behavior, compulsive internet use, and mindful awareness in Taiwan. Computers & Education, 164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104131
- Ching, H.-H., Koo, M., Tsai, T.-H., & Chen, C.-Y. (2015). Effects of a mindfulness meditation course on learning and cognitive performance among university students in Taiwan. Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2015, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/254358
- Chittaro, L., & Vianello, A. (2014). Computer-supported mindfulness: Evaluation of a mobile thought distancing application on naïve meditators. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 72, 337-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2013.11.001
- Chittaro, L., & Vianello, A. (2016). Mobile mindfulness and user’s worry: A qualitative study of using a smartphone app for distancing from negative thoughts. Interacting with Computers, 28(6), 695-717. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwv044
- Common Sense Education. (2019). Dealing with digital distraction in the classroom. Common Sense Education. https://www.commonsense.org/education/videos/dealing-with-digital-distraction-in-the-classroom
- Compson, J. (2017). Cultivating the contemplative mind in cyberspace: Field notes from pedagogical experiments in fully online classes. The Journal of Contemplative Inquiry, 4(1), 107-127.
- Damico, N., & Krutka, D. G. (2018). Social media diaries and fasts: Educating for digital mindfulness with pre-service teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 73, 109-119. https://doi.org/j.tate.2018.03.009
- Economides, M., Martman, J., Bell, M. J., & Sanderson, B. (2018). Improvements in stress, affect, and irritability following brief use of a mindfulness-based smartphone app: A randomized controlled trial. Mindfulness, 9, 1584-1593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-018-0905-4
- Ergas, O., & Todd, S. (2016). Introduction. In O. Ergas & S. Todd (Eds.), Philosophy East/West: Exploring intersections between educational and contemplative practices. John Wiley & Sons.
- Forbes, D. (2019). Mindfulness and its discontents: Education, self, and social transformation. Fernwood Publishing.
- Frith, U. (2020). Fast lane to slow science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(1), 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.10.007
- Gazzaley, A., & Rosen, L.D. (2016). The distracted mind: Ancient brains in a high-tech world. MIT Press.
- Goleman, D., & Davidson, R. J. (2017). The science of meditation: How to change your brain, mind and body. Penguin.
- Gruber, N., & Henriksen, D. (2024). Bridging the distance: Relational mindfulness practices for connection and compassion in online education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 32(1). https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/223931/
- Hall, A. C. G., Lineweaver, T. T., Hogan, E. E., & O’Brien, S. W. (2020). On or off task: The negative influence of laptops on neighboring students’ learning depends on how they are used. Computers & Education, 153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103901
- Hari, J. (2022). Stolen focus: Why you can’t pay attention. Bloomsbury.
- Harford, T. (2018). A powerful way to unleash your natural creativity. TED. https://www.ted.com/talks/tim_harford_a_powerful_way_to_unleash_your_natural_creativity
- Harford, T. (2021, Apr. 8). Technology has turned back the clock on productivity. Tim Harford. https://timharford.com/2021/04/technology-has-turned-back-the-clock-on-productivity/
- Jackson, M. (2009). Distracted: The erosion of attention and the coming dark age. Prometheus.
- Johnson, C. A. (2011). The information diet: A case for conscious consumption. O’Reilly Media.
- Lacy, M. (2014). The slow book revolution: Creating a new culture of reading on college campuses and beyond. ABC-CLIO.
- Levy, D.M. (2016). Mindful tech: How to bring balance to our digital lives. Yale University Press.
- Mahmood L., Hopthrow, T., Randsley de Moura, G. (2016). A moment of mindfulness: Computer-mediated mindfulness practice increases state mindfulness. PLoS ONE 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153923
- Mark, G. (2023). Attention span: Finding focus for a fulfilling life. William Collins.
- Mrazek, A. J., Mrazek, M. D., Cherolini, C. M., Cloughesy, J. N., Cynman, D. J., Gougis, L. J., et al. (2019). The future of mindfulness training is digital, and the future is now. Current Opinion in Psychology, 28, 81-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.11.012
- Miedema, J. (2009). Slow reading. Litwin Books.
- Mikics, D. (2013). Slow reading in a hurried age. Harvard University Press.
- Naish, J. (2008). Enough: Breaking free from the world of more. Hodder & Stoughton.
- Namaziandost, E., & Rezai, A. (2024). Interplay of academic emotion regulation, academic mindfulness, L2 learning experience, academic motivation, and learner autonomy in intelligent computer-assisted language learning: A study of EFL learners. System, 125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103419
- Newkirk, T. (2011). Art of slow reading. Heinemann Educational Books.
- Newport, C. (2019). Digital minimalism: Choosing a focused life in a noisy world. Penguin.
- Newport, C. (2021). A world without email: Reimagining work in the age of overload. Penguin.
- Owen-Smith, P. (2018). The contemplative mind in the scholarship of teaching and learning. Indiana University Press.
- Page, K. (2019). College mindfulness training: Reducing student life stress and improving academic performance. Routledge.
- Palalas, A. (2018). Mindfulness in mobile and ubiquitous learning: Harnessing the power of attention. In S. Yu, M. Ally & A. Tsinakos (Eds.), Mobile and ubiquitous learning: An international handbook (pp.19-44). Springer.
- Palalas, A. (2024). Being whole in a graduate online classroom: A contemplative perspective. In L. A. Jeffrey, A. Palalas, K. Robert & Y.-L. R. Wong (Eds.), Presence in the online world: A contemplative perspective and practice guide for educators (pp. 5-27). Rowman & Littlefield.
- Palalas, A., Heiser, R. E., & Gollert, A. (2022). It’s happy hour somewhere: Videoconferencing guidelines for traversing time and space. CJLT/RCAT, 48(4). https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt28267
- Palalas, A., Pegrum, M., & Dell, D. (2024). Regaining focus: Promoting attentional literacy in digital higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 40(6), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.9627
- Palalas, A., & Silver, J. (2022). Digital wellbeing in language learning and teaching. [Interview with H. Reinders.] Teachers talk tech [podcast series]. https://www.cambridge.org/elt/blog/2022/05/31/digital-wellbeing-language-teaching/
- Pegrum, M. (ongoing). Digital safety & wellness. Digital learning. http://wp.me/P8xJjA-1C
- Pegrum, M., & Palalas, A. (2021). Attentional literacy as a new literacy: Helping students deal with digital disarray. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology/La Revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie, 47(2). https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt28037
- Phan-Le N. T., Brennan, L., & Parker, L. (2022). The search for scientific meaning in mindfulness research: Insights from a scoping review. PLoS ONE, 17(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264924
- Price, C. (2018). How to break up with your phone. Ten Speed Press.
- Rheingold, H. (2011). Infotention part one: Getting ahead of info overload. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tAdOQCgwi2c
- Salcido-Cibrián, L. J., Ramos, N. S., Jiménez, Ó., & Blanca, M. J. (2019). Mindfulness to regulate emotions: The Mindfulness and Emotional Intelligence Program (PINEP) and its adaptation to a virtual learning platform. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, 36, 176-180. https://doi.org/j.ctcp.2019.07.003
- Shabahang, R., Hwang, H., Thomas, E. F., Aruguete, M. S., McCutcheon, L. E., Orosz, G., Khanzadeh, A. A. H., Chirani, B. M., & Zsila, A. (2024). Doomscrolling evokes existential anxiety and fosters pessimism about human nature? Evidence from Iran and the United States. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100438
- Steel, S. (2013). Contemplation as a corrective to technological education. Canadian Journal of Education, 36(3), 458-480.
- Stewart, C., & Bower, M. (2019) Novice online educator conceptual frameworks: A mental model exploration of mindful learning design. Educational Media International, 56(1), 14-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2019.1583463
- Stone, L. (2009, Nov. 30). Beyond simple multi-tasking: Continuous partial attention. Linda Stone. http://lindastone.net/2009/11/30/beyond-simple-multi-tasking-continuous-partial-attention/
- Stone, L. (2009). SIME 2009. [Interview on continuous partial attention.] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YCSBEhPVA0
- Sumuer, E., & Kaşıkcı, D. N. (2022). The role of smartphones in college students’ mind-wandering during learning. Computers & Education, 190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104616
- Tan, L.-F., Dienes, Z., Jansari, A., & Goh, S.-Y. (2014). Effect of mindfulness on brain-computer interface performance. Consciousness and Cognition, 23, 12-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2013.10.010
- Tishman, S. (2017). Slow looking: The art and practice of learning through observation. Routledge.
- Vacca, R. (2018). Promises and pitfalls of computer-supported mindfulness: Exploring a situated mobile approach. Computers, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/computers7010002
- Valkenburg, P. M., van Driel, I. I., & Beyens, I. (2022). The associations of active and passive social media use with well-being: A critical scoping review. New Media & Society, 24(2), 530-549. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211065425
- Whelan, E., Najmul Islam, A. K. M., & Brooks, S. (2020). Applying the SOBC paradigm to explain how social media overload affects academic performance. Computers & Education, 143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103692
Coding (Computational thinking)
- Arfé, B., Vardanega, T., & Ronconi, L. (2020). The effects of coding on children’s planning and inhibition skills. Computers & Education, 148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103807
- Deschryver, M.D., & Yadav, A. (2015). Creative and computational thinking in the context of new literacies: Working with teachers to scaffold complex technology-mediated approaches to teaching and learning. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 23(3), 411-431.
- Egbert, J., Shahrokni, S. A., Abobaker, R., & Borysenko, N. (2021). ‘It’s a chance to make mistakes’: Processes and outcomes of coding in 2nd grade classrooms. Computers & Education, 168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104173
- Fluck, A., & Bower, M. (2015). Computational thinking: Philosophy and practice. In M. Henderson & G. Romeo (Eds.), Teaching and digital technologies: Big issues and critical questions. Cambridge University Press.
- Garrett, F., et al. (2019). At the edge of the internet: Teaching coding and sustainability to Himalayan girls. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 45(3). https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt27864
- Gerson, S. A., Morey, R. D., & van Schaik, J. E. (2022). Coding in the cot? Factors influencing 0-17s’ experiences with technology and coding in the United Kingdom. Computers & Education, 178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104400
- Huerta, M. (2015, Apr. 17). Coding in the classroom: A long-overdue inclusion. Edutopia. http://www.edutopia.org/blog/coding-classroom-long-overdue-inclusion-merle-huerta
- Jenson, J., & Droumeva, M. (2017). Revisiting the media generation: Youth media use and computational literacy instruction. E-learning and Digital Media [early view].
- KnowledgeWorks. (2015). The future of learning: Education in the era of partners in code. KnowledgeWorks. http://www.knowledgeworks.org/future-forecast-4
- Lindberg, R.S.N., Laine, T.H., & Haaranen, L. (2018). Gamifying programming education in K-12: A review of programming curricula in seven countries and programming games. British Journal of Educational Technology [early view].
- Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2021). International forum on AI and the futures of education: Developing competencies for the AI era. 7-8 December 2020. Synthesis Report. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000377251
- Montuori, C., Gambarota, F., Altoé, G., & Arfé, B. (2024). The cognitive effects of computational thinking: A systematic review and meta-analytic study. Computers & Education, 210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104961
- Sonnad, N. (2017, Oct. 12). Tim Cook doesn’t seem to understand that good programmers have to learn English. Quartz. https://qz.com/1101096/apple-ceo-tim-cook-on-learning-to-code-he-doesnt-seem-to-understand-programmers-must-learn-english/
- Stevens, V., & Verschoor, J. (2017). Coding and English language teaching. TESL-EJ, 21(2), 1-15. http://www.tesl-ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume21/ej82/ej82int/
- Zhang, L., & Nouri, J. (2019). A systematic review of learning computational thinking through Scratch in K-9. Computers & Education, 141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103607
COIL (Collaborative online international learning/VE/OIE/Telecollaboration)
- Calvo, L. C. S., Hartle, L. C. (2023). Investigating pre-service teachers from Brazil and the US in a virtual exchange project: Benefits and challenges of student-selected and required technologies. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12000-3
- Hauck, M. (2019). Virtual exchange for (critical) digital literacy skills development. European Journal of Language Policy, 11(2), 187-210. https://doi.org/10.3828/ejlp.2019.12
- Helm, F. (2015). The practices and challenges of telecollaboration in higher education in Europe. Language Learning & Technology, 19(2), 197-217. https://doi.org/10125/44424
- Helm, F. (2019). Languages and international virtual exchange: Introduction to the special issue. European Journal of Language Policy, 11(2), 139-142. https://doi.org/10.3828/ejlp.2019.9
- Helm, F., & Guth, S. (2016). Telecollaboration and language learning. In F. Farr & L. Murray (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language learning and technology. Routledge.
- Helm, F., Guth, S., Shuminov, E., & Van der Velden, B. (2020). Erasmus+ virtual exchange. Internationalisation of Higher Education, 1, 92-109. https://www.handbook-internationalisation.com/media/02818d033e0d8e74995aed9e16e1bb8970060360/r7aklh/pdf_5e81ffb452439.pdf
- Klimanova, L. (2021). The evolution of identity research in CALL: From scripted chatrooms to engaged construction of the digital self. Language Learning & Technology, 25(3), 186–204. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/73455
- Kolm, A., de Nooijer, J., Vanherle, K., et al. (2022). International online collaboration competencies in higher education students: A systematic review. Journal of Studies in International Education, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/10283153211016272
- Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Pegrum, M. (2018). Linguistic diversity in online and mobile learning. In A. Creese & A. Blackledge (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language and superdiversity: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 518-532). Routledge.
- Lenkaitis, C. A. (2022). Integrating the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals:
Developing content for virtual exchanges. Language Learning & Technology, 26(1), 1–20.
https://doi.org/10125/73470 - O’Dowd, R. (2021). Virtual exchange: Moving forward into the next decade. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(3), 209-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1902201
- O’Dowd, R. (2021). What do students learn in virtual exchange? A qualitative content analysis of learning outcomes across multiple exchanges. International Journal of Educational Research, 109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2021.101804
- O’Dowd, R. (2023). Internationalising higher education and the role of virtual exchange. Routledge.
- O’Dowd, R., & O’Rourke, B. (2019). New developments in virtual exchange in foreign language education. Language Learning & Technology, 23(3), 1-7. https://doi.org/10125/44690
- O’Dowd, R., & Ritter, M. (2006). Understanding and working with ‘failed communication’ in telecollaborative exchanges. CALICO Journal, 23(3), 623-642. https://journals.equinoxpub.com/index.php/CALICO/article/view/23162/19167
- O’Dowd, R., Sauro, S., & Spector-Cohen, E. (2020). The role of pedagogical mentoring in virtual exchange. TESOL Quarterly, 54(1), 146-172. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.543
- O’Dowd, R., & Waire, P. (2009). Critical issues in telecollaborative task design. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(2), 173-188. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220902778369
- Thomas, M., & Yamazaki, K. (2021). Introduction: Projects, pandemics and the re-positioning of digital language learning. In M. Thomas & K. Yamazaki (Eds.), Project-based language learning and CALL: From virtual exchange to social justice (pp. 1-18). Equinox.
- Vinagre, M. (2022). Engaging with difference: Integrating the linguistic landscape in virtual exchange. System,105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102750
- Wu, J. G., Feng Teng, M., & Lindsay, M. (2022). Challenges in a mobile English telecollaborative project: Towards a conceptual model. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6371
Community of inquiry
- Dell, D. (2024). Cultivating emotional presence: Building and nurturing an online community of inquiry. In L. A. Jeffrey, A. Palalas, K. Robert & Y.-L. R. Wong (Eds.), Presence in the online world: A contemplative perspective and practice guide for educators (pp. 29-47). Rowman & Littlefield.
- Englander, K., & Russell, B. (2022). Community of Inquiry perceptions and divergences between students and instructors. System, 106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102777
- Garrison, D.R. (2017). E-learning in the 21st century: A community of inquiry framework for research and practice (3rd ed.). Routledge.
- Garrison, D.R., et al. (ongoing). The Community of Inquiry. https://coi.athabascau.ca/
- Kim, G.-C., & Gurvitch, R. (2022). Community of Inquiry analysis of alignment between instructors’ intentions and students’ perceptions in online courses. Journal of Educators Online, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2022.19.2.7
Community of practice
- Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
- Wenger, E. (1998). Introduction: A social theory of learning. In E. Wenger, Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity (pp. 3-15). Cambridge University Press.
- Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice. Harvard Business School Press.
- Wenger-Trayner, E., & Wenger-Trayner, B. (2015). Introduction to communities of practice. Wenger-Trayner. http://wenger-trayner.com/introduction-to-communities-of-practice/
Constructivism
- Concept to Classroom. (2004). Constructivism as a paradigm for teaching and learning. Educational Broadcasting Corporation. http://www.thirteen.org/edonline/concept2class/constructivism/index.html
- Dalgarno, B. (2001). Interpretations of constructivism and consequences for computer assisted learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(2), 183-194.
- Duffy, T. M., & Jonassen, D. H. (1992). Constructivism: New implications for instructional technology. In T. M. Duffy & D. H. Jonassen (Eds.), Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation (pp. 1-16). Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Harrison, T., & Laco, D. (2022). Where’s the character education in online higher education? Constructivism, virtue ethics and roles of online educators. E-Learning and Digital Media, 19(6), 555-573. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530221104885
- Phillips, D. C. (1995). The good, the bad, and the ugly: The many faces of constructivism. Educational Researcher, 24(7), 5-12.
- Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4-13.
Digital exclusion (Digital divide)
- Acharya, B. N., & Rana, K. (2024). How students and teachers voyaged from physical classroom to Emergency Remote Teaching in COVID-19 crisis: A case of Nepal. E-Learning and Digital Media, 21(2), 125-140. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530231156166
- Adam, T. (2019) Digital neocolonialism and massive open online courses (MOOCs): Colonial pasts and neoliberal futures. Learning, Media and Technology, 44(3), 365-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2019.1640740
- Anderson, N. (2015). Digital technologies and equity: gender, digital divide. In M. Henderson & G. Romeo (Eds.), Teaching and digital technologies: Big issues and critical questions. Cambridge University Press.
- Banaji, S., & Bhat, R. (2022). Social media and hate. Routledge.
- Buchi, M., Just, N., & Latzer, M. (2016). Modeling the second-level digital divide: A five-country study of social differences in internet use. New Media & Society, 18(1), 2703-2722.
- Camerini, A.-L., Schulz, P., & Jeannet, A.-M. (2017). The social inequalities of internet access, its use, and the impact on children’s academic performance: Evidence from a longitudinal study in Switzerland. New Media & Society, 1-20.
- Carboni, I., Jeffrie, N., Lindsey, D., Shanahan, M., Sibthorpe, C., Butler, C., & Lopez, M. (2021). Connected women: The mobile gender gap report 2021. GSMA. https://www.gsma.com/r/gender-gap/
- Correa, T., & Pavez, I. (2016). Digital inclusion in rural areas: A qualitative exploration of challenges faced by people from isolated communities. JCMC, 21, 247-263.
- Correa, T., Valenzuela, S., & Pavez, I. (2024). For better and for worse: A panel survey of how mobile-only and hybrid Internet use affects digital skills over time. New Media & Society, 26(2), 995-1017. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211059114
- Davis, J. L. (2022). How artifacts afford: The power and politics of everyday things. MIT Press.
- Delaporte, A., Bahia, K., et al. (2022). The state of mobile internet connectivity 2022. GSMA. https://www.gsma.com/r/somic/
- ELI. (2015). 7 things you should read about … digital divides and today’s technologies. EDUCAUSE. https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/elir1507.pdf
- ELI. (2021). 7 things you should know about … the digital divide. https://library.educause.edu/-/media/files/library/2021/4/eli7177.pdf
- González-Betancor, S. M., López-Puig, A. J., & Cardenal, M. E. (2021). Digital inequality at home: The school as compensatory agent. Computers & Education, 168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104195
- Graham, A., & Sahlberg, P. (2020, Mar. 26). Schools are moving online, but not all children start out digitally equal. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/schools-are-moving-online-but-not-all-children-start-out-digitally-equal-134650
- Hamilton, Z., Downer, M., & Acland, S. (2022). The digital worlds of displacement-affected communities: A cross-context study of how people affected by displacement use mobile phones. GSMA & UNHCR. https://www.gsma.com/mobilefordevelopment/the-digital-worlds-of-displacement-affected-communities/
- Heath, M. K., & Segal, P. (2021). What pre-service teacher technology integration conceals and
reveals: “Colorblind” technology in schools. Computers & Education, 170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104225 - Heikkilä, R., Leguina, A., & Purhonen, S. (2022). The stratification of media usage in Finland, 2007–2018: Signs of socio-political polarization? New Media & Society, 24(5), 1053-1075. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820971612
- Helsper, E.J., & Reisdorf, B.C. (2017). The emergence of a ‘digital underclass’ in Great Britain and Sweden: Changing reasons for digital exclusion. New Media & Society, 19(8), 1253-1270. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816634676
- Heponiemi, T., Gluschkoff, K., Leemann, L., Manderbacka, K., Aalto, A.-M., & Hyppönen, H. (2023). Digital inequality in Finland: Access, skills and attitudes as social impact mediators. New Media & Society, 25(9), 2475–2491. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211023007
- Holeton, R. (2020, Feb. 28). Toward inclusive learning spaces: Physiological, cognitive, and cultural inclusion and the learning space rating system. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/2/toward-inclusive-learning-spaces
- Kemp, E. (2024). Language and Digital Humanitarian Action. GSMA/CLEAR Global. https://www.gsma.com/solutions-and-impact/connectivity-for-good/mobile-for-development/gsma_resources/language-and-digital-humanitarian-action-the-state-of-inclusion-and-exclusion-for-marginalised-language-speakers-in-digital-humanitarian-services/
- Kuhn, C., Khoo, S. M., Czerniewicz, L., et al. (2023). Understanding digital inequality: A theoretical kaleidoscope. Postdigital Science and Education, 5, 894-932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-023-00395-8
- Kuhn, A., Schwabe, A., Boomgarden, H., Brandl, L., Stocker, G., Lauer, G., Brendel-Kepser, I., & Krause-Wolters, M. (2024). Who gets lost? How digital academic reading impacts equal opportunity in higher education. New Media & Society, 26(2), 1034-1055. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211072306
- Leurs, K. (2023). Digital migration. Sage.
- Marler, W. (2018). Mobile phones and inequality: Findings, trends, and future directions. New Media & Society, 20(9), 3498-3520. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818765154
- Mavridi, S. (2020). Digital literacies and the new digital divide. In S. Mavridi & D. Xerri (Eds.), English for 21st century skills (pp. 90-98). Express Publishing.
- Munn, L. (2022). Automation is a myth. Stanford University Press.
- Newlands, G., & Lutz, C. (2021). Crowdwork and the mobile underclass: Barriers to participation in India and the United States. New Media & Society, 23(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820901847
- Nique, M., Tiel Groenestege, M., Satari, A., Sibthorpe, C., & Viljoen, K. (2022). Driving the digital inclusion of persons with disabilities: Policy considerations for low- and middle-income countries. GSMA. https://www.gsma.com/mobilefordevelopment/resources/driving-the-digital-inclusion-of-persons-with-disabilities/
- Pegrum, M., Hockly, N., & Dudeney, G. (2022). Box 1.4: Does the digital divide still matter? In M. Pegrum, N. Hockly & G. Dudeney, Digital literacies (2nd ed., pp. 22-23). Routledge.
- Peña Gangadharan, S. (2017). The downside of digital inclusion: Expectations and experiences of privacy and surveillance among marginal internet users. New Media & Society, 19(4), 597-615.
- Reisdorf, B.C., & Groselj, D. (2017). Internet (non-)use types and motivational access: Implications for digital inequalities research. New Media & Society, 19(8), 1157-1176.
- Scheerder, A. J., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2019). Internet use in the home: Digital inequality from a domestication perspective. New Media & Society, 21(10), 2099-2118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819844299
- Sun, X., Duan, C., Yao, L., Zhang, Y., Chinyani, T., & Niu, G. (2021). Socioeconomic status and social networking site addiction among children and adolescents: Examining the roles of parents’ active mediation and ICT attitudes. Computers & Education, 173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104292
- Taipale, S. (2016). Do the mobile-rich get richer? Internet use, travelling and social differentiations in Finland. New Media & Society, 18(1), 44-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814536574
- Thornham, H., & Gómez Cruz, E. (2017). [Im]mobility in the age of [im]mobile phones: Young NEETs and digital practices. New Media & Society, 19(11), 1794-1809.
- Tour, K., et al. (2023, Mar. 1). Settling in digital Australia. Impact. https://amesnews.com.au/latest-articles/settling-in-digital-australia/
- Tsatsou, P. (2022). Editor’s introduction to special issue: Vulnerable people’s digital inclusion in a perplexed milieu of intersectional vulnerabilities. New Media & Society, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211063175
- University of Copenhagen. (2023, Jul. 10). ChatGPT promotes American norms and values. University of Copenhagen. https://news.ku.dk/all_news/2023/07/chatgpt-promotes-american-norms-and-values/
- Van de Werfhorst, H. G., Emma, E., & Geven, S. (2024). The digital divide in online education: Inequality in digital readiness of students and schools. Computers and Education Open, 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100100
- Walker Rettberg, J. (2022, Dec. 6). ChatGPT is multilingual but monocultural, and it’s learning your values. jill/txt. https://jilltxt.net/right-now-chatgpt-is-multilingual-but-monocultural-but-its-learning-your-values/
- Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. MIT Press.
- Van Deursen, A., & van Dijk, J. (2014). The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media & Society, 16(3), 507-526.
- Van Deursen, A.J.A.M., & Helsper, E.J. (2018). Collateral benefits of internet use: Explaining the diverse outcomes of engaging with the internet. New Media & Society, 20(7), 2333-2351.
- Van Dijk, J. (2020). The digital divide. Polity.
- Wang, F., Ni, X., Zhang, M., & Zhang, J. (2024). Educational digital inequality: A meta-analysis of the relationship between digital device use and academic performance in adolescents. Computers & Education, 213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105003
- Warschauer, M., & Tate, T. (2018). Digital divides and social inclusion. In K.A. Mills, A. Stornaiuolo, A. Smith & J. Zacher Pandya (Eds.), Handbook of writing, literacies, and education in digital cultures (pp.63-75). Routledge.
- Weingartner, S. (2021). Digital omnivores? How digital media reinforce social inequalities in cultural consumption. New Media & Society, 23(11), 3370-3390. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820957635
- West, M. (2023). An ed-tech tragedy? Educational technologies and school closures in the time of COVID-19? UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000386701
- Yuen, A.H.K., Park, J., Chen, L., & Cheng, M. (2018). The significance of cultural capital and parental mediation for digital inequity. New Media & Society, 20(2), 599-617.
- Zembylas, M. (2023). A decolonial approach to AI in higher education teaching and learning: strategies for undoing the ethics of digital neocolonialism. Learning, Media and Technology, 48(1), 25-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2021.2010094
Digital inclusion (Diversity/Equity)
- Barahona, M., David, V., Gallegos, F., Reyes, J., Ibaceta-Quijanes, X., & Darwin, S. (2023). Analysing preservice teachers’ enactment of the UDL framework to support diverse students in a remote teaching context. System, 114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103027
- CAST [Center for Applied Special Technology]. (2018). The UDL guidelines [version 2.2]. http://udlguidelines.cast.org/
- Collier, A. (2020, Oct. 26). Inclusive design and design justice: Strategies to shape our classes and communities. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/10/inclusive-design-and-design-justice-strategies-to-shape-our-classes-and-communities
- Costanza-Chock, S. (2020). Design justice: Community-led practices to build the worlds we need. MIT Press.
- Das, M., Ostrowski, A. K., Ben-David, S., Roeder, G. J., Kimura, K., D’Ignazio, C., Breazeal, C., & Verm, A. (2022). Auditing design justice: The impact of social movements on design pedagogy at a technology institution. In G. Goldschmidt & E. Tarazi (Eds.), 13th Design Thinking Research Symposium. Expanding the frontiers of design: A blessing or a curse? Proceedings. Design Tech. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1651493/FULLTEXT01.pdf
- Davidoff, M. (2024, Nov. 11). How broadening AI access can help bridge the digital divide. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2024/11/how-broadening-ai-access-can-help-bridge-the-digital-divide
- DeBacco, K., & Mattos, N. (2023, Mar. 13). A DEI course design rubric: Supporting teaching and learning in uncertain times. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2023/3/a-dei-course-design-rubric-supporting-teaching-and-learning-in-uncertain-times
- EDUCAUSE. (2022). The EDUCAUSE guide to diversity, equity, and inclusion. https://www.educause.edu/about/the-educause-guide-to-diversity-equity-and-inclusion
- Gierdowski, D. C., & Galanek, J. D. (2020). ECAR Study of the Technology Needs of Students with Disabilities, 2020. ECAR. https://er.educause.edu/-/media/files/library/2020/5/studentsdisabilities2020.pdf
- Goodyear, P. (2022). Realising the good university: Social innovation, care, design justice and educational infrastructure. Postdigital Science and Education, 4, 33-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00253-5
- Gonzalez, L., et al. (2024, Aug. 15). Leveraging generative AI for inclusive excellence in higher education. The EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2024/8/leveraging-generative-ai-for-inclusive-excellence-in-higher-education
- Hines, M. B., & Kersulov, M. (2015). Engagement and resistance at Last Chance High: A case study of twenty-first-century literacies and identities in one English classroom. The Curriculum Journal, 26(2), 224-248. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2015.1045536
- Holeton, R. (2020. Feb. 28). Toward inclusive learning spaces: Physiological, cognitive, and cultural inclusion and the learning space rating system. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/2/toward-inclusive-learning-spaces
- Hollett, T., Luo, S., Turcotte, N., Ramsay, C., Stubbs, C., & Zidik, Z. (2020). Moments of friction in virtual reality: How feeling histories impact experience. E-learning and Digital Media, 17(1), 56-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753019876043
- Ikebuchi, S. (2023). Accessing education: Equity, diversity, and inclusion in online learning. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 49(1). https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt28349
- Klimanova, L., & Murphy-Judy, K. (2024). CALL and social justice. In R. Hampel & U. Stickler (Eds.), The Bloomsbury handbook of language learning and technology (pp. 315-334). Bloomsbury.
- Kukulska-Hulme, A., Wise, A. F., Coughlan, T., Biswas, G., Bossu, C., Burriss, S. K., Charitonos, K., et al. (2024). Innovating Pedagogy 2024. The Open University. https://iet.open.ac.uk/files/innovating-pedagogy-2024.pdf
- Kumi-Yeboah, A., & Amponsah, S. (2023). An exploratory study of instructors’ perceptions on inclusion of culturally responsive pedagogy in online education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(4), 878-897. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13299
- Leurs, K. (2023). Digital migration. Sage.
- Li, K. C., Wong, B. T. M., Kwan, R., & Cheung, S. K. S. (2023). Guest editorial: Catering for learner diversity with technological advances. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 20(3), 289-290. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-09-2023-251
- Meyer, A., & Rose, D. (2024). Universal Design for Learning: Principles, framework, and practice. CAST.
- Pelletier, K., et al. (2023). EDUCAUSE Horizon Report: Holistic Student Experience Edition. EDUCAUSE. https://library.educause.edu/resources/2023/10/2023-educause-horizon-report-holistic-student-experience-edition
- Salas-Pilco, S. Z., Yang, Y., & van Aalst, J. (2022). Emerging technologies for diverse and inclusive education from a sociocultural perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13279
- Starks, A. C., & Reich, S. M. (2023). “What about special ed?“: Barriers and enablers for teaching with technology in special education. Computers & Education, 193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104665
- Tobin, T. J., & Behling, K. T. (2018). Reach everyone, teach everyone: Universal design for learning in higher education. West Virginia University Press.
- UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. Report from the International Commission on the Futures of Education. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379707
- Viberg, O., Kizilcec, R. F., Wise, A. F., Jivet, I., & Nixon, N. (2024). Advancing equity and inclusion in educational practices with AI-powered educational decision support systems (AI-EDSS). British Journal of Educational Technology, 55, 1974-1981. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13507
- Yang, M., Shams Ud Duha, M., Kirsch, B. A., Glaser, N., Crompton, H., & Luo, T. (2024): Universal design in online education: a systematic review. Distance Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2024.2303494
Digital literacies
- Alexander, B., Adams Becker, S., & Cummins, M. (2016). Digital Literacy: An NMC Horizon Project strategic brief. New Media Consortium. https://www.nmc.org/publication/digital-literacy-an-nmc-horizon-project-strategic-brief/
- Al-Seghayer, K. (2024). Comparative efficacy of digital and nondigital texts on reading comprehension and EFL learners’ perceptions of their merits. Learning & Technology, 28(1), 1-30. https://hdl.handle.net/10125/73589
- Allen, C. (2015). Marriages of convenience? Teachers and coursebooks in the digital age. ELT Journal, 69, 249-263.
- Anderson, J., & Rainie, L. (2017). The future of truth and misinformation online. Pew Research Center: Internet & Technology. http://www.pewinternet.org/2017/10/19/the-future-of-truth-and-misinformation-online/
- Anspach, N. M., & Carlson, T. N. (2024). Not who you think? Exposure and vulnerability to misinformation. New Media & Society, 26(8), 4847-4866. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221130422
- Baron, N. S. (2008). Always on: Language in an online and mobile world. Oxford University Press.
- Baron, N. S. (2015). Words onscreen: The fate of reading in a digital world. Oxford University Press.
- Baron, N. S. (2021). How we read now: Strategic choices for print, screen and audio. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190084097.001.0001
- Baron, N. S. (2021, May 10.). When reading to learn, what works best for students — printed books or digital texts? The Los Angeles Times. https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2021-05-10/digital-books-reading-learning-pandemic
- Belshaw, D. (2014). The essential elements of digital literacies. https://dougbelshaw.com/thesis.html
- Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2016). Multimodality, learning and communication: A social semiotic frame. Routledge.
- boyd, d. (2017, Jan. 5). Did media literacy backfire? Points. https://points.datasociety.net/did-media-literacy-backfire-7418c084d88d
- Broadband Commission for Sustainable Development. (2017, Sep.). Working group on education: Digital skills for life and work. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0025/002590/259013e.pdf
- Brooks, A. C. (2023, Jul. 6). Google isn’t grad school. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/07/illusion-explanatory-depth-humility/674624/
- Brøvig-Hanssen, R., & Jones, E. (2023). Remix’s retreat? Content moderation, copyright law and mashup music. New Media & Society, 25(6), 1271-1289. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211026059
- Brown, M. (2017, May 29). Exploring the underbelly of digital literacies. OEB Insights. https://oeb-insights.com/exploring-the-underbelly-of-digital-literacies/
- Brown, M. (2017, Oct. 5).A critical review of frameworks for digital literacy: Beyond the flashy, flimsy and faddish – Part 1. TELall. http://blog.ascilite.org/a-critical-review-of-frameworks-for-digital-literacy-beyond-the-flashy-flimsy-and-faddish-part-1/
- Bulfin, S., & McGraw, K. (2015). Digital literacy in theory, policy and practice: Old concerns, new opportunities. In M. Henderson & G. Romeo (Eds.), Teaching and digital technologies: Big issues and critical questions. Cambridge University Press.
- Burniske, R. W. (2008). Literacy in the digital age. Corwin.
- Caballero-Julia, D., et al. (2024). Unpacking the relationship between screen use and educational outcomes in childhood: A systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105049
- Carillo, E. C. (2019). MLA guide to digital literacy. MLA.
- Casal-Otero, L., Catala, A., Fernández-Morante, C., Taboada, M., Cebreiro, B., & Barro, S. (2023). AI literacy in K-12: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(29). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00418-7
- Chanier, T., & Lamy, M.-N. (2017). Researching technology-mediated multimodal interaction. In C.A. Chapelle & S. Sauro (Eds.), The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning (pp.428-443). John Wiley.
- Chatfield, T. (2015, Feb. 23). Why reading and writing on paper can be better for your brain. The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/feb/23/reading-writing-on-paper-better-for-brain-concentration
- Chen, Y., Zhang, P., & Huang, L. (2022). Translanguaging/trans-semiotizing in teacher-learner interactions on social media: Making learner agency visible and achievable. System, 104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102686
- Choi, M., Glassman, M., & Cristol, D. (2017). What it means to be a citizen in the internet age: Development of a reliable and valid digital citizenship scale. Computers & Education, 107, 100-112.
- Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2008). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Pfeiffer.
- Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2015). The things you do to know: An introduction to the pedagogy of multiliteracies. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Learning by design (pp.1-36). Palgrave Macmillan.
- Cope, B., Kalantzis, M., & Schamroth Adams, S. (2017). Multiliteracies: Meaning-making and learning in the era of digital text. In F. Serafini & E. Gee (Eds.), Remixing multiliteracies: Theory and practice from New London to new times. Teachers College Press.
- Dahlström, H. (2022). Students as digital multimodal text designers: A study of resources, affordances, and experiences. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(2), 391-407. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13171
- Diakopoulos, N., & Johnson, D. (2021). Anticipating and addressing the ethical implications of deepfakes in the context of elections. New Media & Society, 23(7), 2072-2098. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820925811
- Díaz, B., Nussbaum, M., Greiff, S., & Santana, M. (2024). The role of technology in reading literacy: Is Sweden going back or moving forward by returning to paper-based reading? Computers & Education, 213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105014
- Dressen-Hammouda, D., & Wigham, C. R. (2022). Evaluating multimodal literacy: Academic and professional interactions around student-produced instructional video tutorials. System, 105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102727
- Dudeney, G., & Hockly, N. (2016). Literacies, technology and language teaching. In F. Farr & L. Murray (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language learning and technology. Taylor & Francis.
- Dudeney, G., & Silver, J. (2022). Digital literacies for language teachers. [Interview with H. Reinders.] Teachers talk tech [podcast series]. https://www.cambridge.org/elt/blog/2022/05/31/digital-literacies-language-teachers/
- The Editors of Scientific American. (2020). When ‘like’ is a weapon. Scientific American, 29(4), 39.
- ELI. (2015). 7 things you should know about … visual literacy. http://www.educause.edu/library/resources/7-things-you-should-know-about-visual-literacy
- ELI. (2019). 7 things you should know about … digital literacies. EDUCAUSE. https://library.educause.edu/-/media/files/library/2019/7/eli7169.pdf
- Engdal Jensen, R., Roe, A., Blikstad-Balas, M. (2024). The smell of paper or the shine of a screen? Students’ reading comprehension, text processing, and attitudes when reading on paper and screen, Computers & Education, 219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105107
- Finn, E. (2017). What algorithms want: Imagination in the age of computing. MIT Press.
- Fisher, M., et al. (2020). The tribalism of truth. Scientific American, 29(4), 66-69.
- Fjørtoft, H. (2020). Multimodal digital classroom assessments. Computers & Education, 152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103892
- Foer, F. (2018). The era of fake video begins. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/05/realitys-end/556877/
- Forte, M., Jacobson, T., Mackey, T., O’Keefe, E., Stone, K., et al. (2020). 2018 metaliteracy goals and learning objectives (updated Feb. 27, 2020). Metaliteracy. https://metaliteracy.org/learning-objectives/2018-metaliteracy-goals-and-learning-objectives/
- Gattupalli, S., Maloy, R. W., & Edwards, S. A. (2023). Prompt literacy: A pivotal educational skill in the age of AI. ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst: College of Education Working Papers and Reports Series, University of Massachusetts Amherst. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/education_working_papers/6/
- Gee, J. P. (2015). Literacy and education. Routledge.
- Gee, J. P., & Hayes, E. R. (2011). Language and learning in the digital age. Routledge.
- Guichon, N., & Cohen, C. (2016). Multimodality and CALL. In F. Farr & L. Murray (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language learning and technology. Taylor & Francis.
- Haas, C., & McGrath, M. (2018). Embodiment and literacy in a digital age. In K.A. Mills, A. Stornaiuolo, A. Smith & J. Zacher Pandya (Eds.), Handbook of writing, literacies, and education in digital cultures (pp.125-135). Routledge.
- Hafner, C. A., Chik, A., & Jones, R. H. (2015). Digital literacies and language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 19(3), 1-7. http://llt.msu.edu/issues/october2015/commentary.pdf
- Halamish, V., & Elbaz, E. (2020). Children’s reading comprehension and metacomprehension on screen versus on paper. Computers & Education, 145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103737
- Harford, T. (2017, Mar. 11). The problem with facts. Financial Times: FT Weekend Supplement – Life & Arts, p.18.
- Hauck, M. (2019). Virtual exchange for (critical) digital literacy skills development. European Journal of Language Policy, 11(2), 187-210. https://doi.org/10.3828/ejlp.2019.12
- Hauck, M., Galley, R., & Warnecke, S. (2016). Researching participatory literacy and positioning in online learning communities. In F. Farr & L. Murray (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language learning and technology. Taylor & Francis.
- Hauck, M., & Kurek, G. (2014). Closing the ‘digital divide’ – A framework for multiliteracy training. In L. Williams & J. Pettes Guikema (Eds.), Digital literacies in foreign language education: Research, perspectives, and best practice (pp.119-140). CALICO Monograph Series. https://calico.org/page.php?id=649
- Hauck, M., & Kurek, M. (2017). Digital literacies in teacher preparation. In S. Thorne & S. May (Eds.), Language, Education and Technology, Encyclopedia of Language and Education (pp.1-13). Springer.
- Hertz, M. B. (2019). Digital and media literacy in the age of the internet: Practical classroom applications. Rowman & Littlefield.
- Hibbert, M., Altman, E., & Shippen, T. (2024, Jun. 3). A framework for AI literacy. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2024/6/a-framework-for-ai-literacy
- Hobbs, R. (2017). Create to learn: Introduction to digital literacy. Wiley Blackwell.
- Hwang, Y., Lee, J. H., & Shin, D. (2023). What is prompt literacy? An exploratory study of language learners’ development of new literacy skill using generative AI. arXiv 2311.05373v1. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.05373
- Jabr, F. (2013, Apr. 11). The reading brain in the digital age: The science of paper versus screens. Scientific American. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=reading-paper-screens
- Jack, C. (2017). Lexicon of lies: Terms for problematic information. Data & Society Research Institute. https://datasociety.net/output/lexicon-of-lies/
- Jaleniauskiene, E., & Kasperiuniene, J. (2023). Infographics in higher education: A scoping review. E-Learning and Digital Media, 20(2), 191-206. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530221107774
- James, K. H., & Engelhardt, L. (2012). The effects of handwriting experience on functional brain development in pre-literate children. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 1, 32-42.
- Jewitt, C. (2017). A multimodal perspective on touch, communication, and learning. In F. Serafini & E. Gee (Eds.), Remixing multiliteracies: Theory and practice from New London to new times. Teachers College Press.
- Jiang, L., & Luk, J. (2016). Multimodal composing as a learning activity in English classrooms: Inquiring into the sources of its motivational capacity. System, 59, 1-11.
- Jones, R. H., & Hafner, C. A. (2021). Understanding digital literacies: A practical introduction. Routledge.
- Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2012). Literacies. Cambridge University Press.
- Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2022). After language: A grammar of multiform transposition. In C. Lütge (Ed.), Foreign language learning in the digital age: Theory and pedagogy for developing literacies (pp. 34-63). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003032083-4
- Kemp, E. (2024). Language and Digital Humanitarian Action. GSMA/CLEAR Global. https://www.gsma.com/solutions-and-impact/connectivity-for-good/mobile-for-development/gsma_resources/language-and-digital-humanitarian-action-the-state-of-inclusion-and-exclusion-for-marginalised-language-speakers-in-digital-humanitarian-services/
- Kern, R. (2021). Twenty-five years of digital literacies in CALL. Language Learning & Technology, 25(3), 132–150. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/73453
- Kirschenbaum, M.G. (2016). Track changes: A literary history of word processing. Belknap Press.
- Kjærsholm Boie, M. A., Dalsgaard, C., & Caviglia, F. (2023). Digital instinct: A keyword for making sense of students’ digital practice and digital literacy. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13398
- Kong, S.-C., Cheung, W. M.-Y., & Zhang, G. (2023). Evaluating an Artificial Intelligence Literacy Programme for Developing University Students’ Conceptual Understanding, Literacy, Empowerment and Ethical Awareness. Educational Technology & Society, 26(1), 16-30. https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.202301_26(1).0002
- Kong, Y., Seo, Y.S., & Zhai, L. (2018). Comparison of reading performance on screen and on paper: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 123, 138-149.
- Kouritzin, S. (2020). Post-truth pedagogy for TESOL: Our collective responsibility for the two-legged, the four-legged, the flyers, the swimmers, the multi-legged, and the stationary. In J. Goulah & J. Katunich (Eds.), TESOL and sustainability: English teaching in the Anthropocene era (pp. 65-81). Bloomsbury.
- Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. Routledge.
- Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.
- Kurek, M., & Hauck, M. (2014). Closing the ‘digital divide’ – A framework for multiliteracy training. In J. Pettes Guikema & L. Williams (Eds.), Digital literacies in foreign and second language education: Research, perspectives, and best practice. CALICO.
- Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2006). New literacies: Everyday practices and classroom learning (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
- Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2008). Digital literacies: Concepts, policies and practices. Peter Lang.
- Laupichler, M. C., Aster, A., Schirch, J., & Raupach, T. (2022). Artificial intelligence literacy in higher and adult education: A scoping literature review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100101
- León, S. P., & García-Martínez, I. (2021). Impact of the provision of PowerPoint slides on learning. Computers & Education, 173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104283
- Lessig, L. (2007). Larry Lessig on laws that choke creativity. TED Talks. http://www.ted.com/talks/larry_lessig_says_the_law_is_strangling_creativity.html
- Lessig, L. (2008). Remix: Making art and commerce thrive in the hybrid economy. Bloomsbury.
- Lessig, L. (2010). Re-examining the remix. TED Talks. http://www.ted.com/talks/lessig_nyed.html
- Lin, A. M. Y., Sohn, B.-G., Brisson, G., Keiko, T., & Levasseur, C. (2021). Introduction: Redesigning the pedagogy of multiliteracies II for acting in a society with uncertainties. OLBI Journal, 11, 15-27. https://doi.org/10.18192/olbij.v11i1.6171
- Liu, C.-C., Chen, W.-C., Lin, H.-M., & Huang, Y.-Y. (2017). A remix-oriented approach to promoting student engagement in a long-term participatory learning program. Computers & Education, 110, 1-15.
- Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1-16). https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3313831.3376727
- Lotherington, H. (2021). Language in digital motion: From ABCs to intermediality and why this matters for language learning. In L. Elleström (Ed.), Beyond Media Borders, vol. 1. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49679-1_7
- Lotherington, H. & Bradley, N. (2024). Hey Siri: Should #language, :), and follow me be taught?: A historical review of evolving communication conventions across digital media environments and uncomfortable questions for language teachers. Language Learning & Technology, 28(1), 1-19. https://hdl.handle.net/10125/73552
- Lotherington, H., Thumlert, K., Boreland, T., & Tomin, B. (2021). Redesigning for mobile plurilingual futures. OLBI Journal, 11, 141-172. https://doi.org/10.18192/olbij.v11i1.6179
- Luckin, R. (2023, Jul. 14). Yes, AI could profoundly disrupt education. But maybe that’s not a bad thing. The Guardian.https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/jul/14/ai-artificial-intelligence-disrupt-education-creativity-critical-thinking
- Lütge, C. (Ed.). (2022). Foreign language learning in the digital age: Theory and pedagogy for developing literacies. Taylor & Francis.
- Lütge, C., & Stannard, M. (2022). Trajectories for multiliteracies in foreign language education: An inclusive paradigm for challenging times. In C. Lütge (Ed.), Foreign language learning in the digital age: Theory and pedagogy for developing literacies. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003032083-21
- Mangen, A., & Velay, J.-L. (2010). Digitizing literacy: Reflections on the haptics of writing. In M.H. Zadeh (Ed.), Advances in haptics (pp. 385-401). In-Tech. http://www.intechopen.com/books/advances-in-haptics/digitizing-literacy-reflections-on-the-haptics-of-writing
- Manjoo, F. (2008). True enough: Learning to live in a post-fact society. Wiley.
- Marwick, A., & Lewis, R. (2017). Media manipulation and disinformation online. Data & Society Research Institute. https://datasociety.net/output/media-manipulation-and-disinfo-online/
- Mavridi, S. (2020). Digital literacies and the new digital divide. In S. Mavridi & D. Xerri (Eds.), English for 21st century skills (pp. 90-98). Express Publishing.
- Mayer, R. E. (2017). Instruction based on visualizations. In R. E. Mayer & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction (2nd ed., pp. 483-501). Routledge.
- Mayer, R. E. (2020). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
- McVee, M.B., Gavalek, J.R., & Shanahan, L.E. (2017). What scholars of literacy can learn from embodied cognition. In F. Serafini & E. Gee (Eds.), Remixing multiliteracies: Theory and practice from New London to new times. Teachers College Press.
- Mihailidis, P. (2015). Digital curation and digital literacy: Evaluating the role of curation in developing critical literacies for participation in digital culture. E-learning and Digital Media, 12(5-6), 443-458.
- Mills, K.A. (2016). Literacy theories for the digital age: Social, critical, multimodal, spatial, material and sensory lenses. Multilingual Matters.
- Mills, K.A., Unsworth, L., & Exley, B. (2018). Sensory literacies, the body, and digital media. In K.A. Mills, A. Stornaiuolo, A. Smith & J. Zacher Pandya (Eds.), Handbook of writing, literacies, and education in digital cultures (pp.26-36). Routledge.
- Milner, R. (2016). The world made meme: Public conversations and participatory media. MIT Press.
- Mina, A. X. (2019). Memes to movements: How the world’s most viral media is changing social protest and power. Beacon.
- Moreno-Almeida, C. (2021). Memes as snapshots of participation: The role of digital amateur activists in authoritarian regimes. New Media & Society, 23(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820912722
- Murray, L., Giralt, M., & Benini, S. (2020). Extending digital literacies: Proposing an agentive literacy to tackle the problems of distractive technologies in language learning. ReCALL, 32(3), 250-271. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344020000130
- Nascimbeni, F., & Vosloo, S. (2019). Digital literacy for children: Exploring definitions and frameworks. UNICEF.
- NCTE (National Council of Teachers of English), [USA]. (2013). The NCTE definition of 21st century literacies. [Adopted 2008; updated 2013]. http://www.ncte.org/positions/statements/21stcentdefinition
- The New London Group (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1).
- Newman, N., & Fletcher, R. (2017). Bias, bullshit and lies: Audience perspectives on low trust in the media. Reuters.
- Newman, N., Fletcher, R., et al. (2018). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2018. Reuters. http://media.digitalnewsreport.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/digital-news-report-2018.pdf?x89475
- Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, K. W. S., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). AI literacy: Definition, teaching, evaluation and ethical issues. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 58(1), 504-509. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.487
- Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2. https://10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041
- Ng, D. T. K., Wu, W., Leung, J. K. L., Chiu, T. K., F., & Chu, S. K. W. (2024). Design and validation of the AI literacy questionnaire: The affective, behavioural, cognitive and ethical approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(3), 1082-1104. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13411
- O’Connor, C., & Weatherall, J. O. (2020). Why we trust lies. Scientific American, 29(4), 20-25.
- Pangrazio, L., Godhe, A.-L., & González López Ledesma, A. (2020). What is digital literacy? A comparative review of publications across three language contexts. E-learning and Digital Media, 17(6), 442-459. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753020946291
- Paris, B., & Donovan, J. (2019, Sep. 18). Deepfakes and cheap fakes: The manipulation of audio and visual evidence. Data & Society. https://datasociety.net/library/deepfakes-and-cheap-fakes/
- Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the internet is hiding from you. Viking.
- Peachey, N. (2016). Thinking critically through digital media. The Digital Classrooms Series. Peacheypublications.com.
- Pegrum, M. (ongoing). Digital literacies. Digital learning. http://wp.me/P8xJjA-1j
- Pegrum, M., Hockly, N., & Dudeney, G. (2022). Digital literacies (2nd ed.). Routledge.
- Pölzl-Stefanec, E., Paleczek, L., & Eichen, L. (2021). Editorial: Digitalisation in early childhood: Approaches, effects and critical views. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(6), 2093-2096. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13166
- Potter, J., & Gilje, Ø. (2015). Curation as a new literacy practice. E-learning and Digital Media, 12(2), 123-127. http://ldm.sagepub.com/content/12/2/123.full.pdf+html
- Reedy, K., & Parker, J. (Eds.). (2018). Digital literacy unpacked. Facet Publishing.
- Reinders, H., Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Wilson, A. (2024). Humanizing technology in language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press. https://elt.oup.com/feature/global/expert/humanising-tech
- Reinhardt, J., & Thorne, S. L. (2019). Digital literacies as emergent multifarious repertoires. In N. Arnold & L. Ducate (Eds.), Engaging language learners through CALL: From theory and research to informed practice (pp. 208-239). Equinox.
- Rheingold, H. (2012). Net smart: How to thrive online. MIT Press.
- Ronconi, A., Veronesi, V., Mason, L., Manzione, L., Florit, E., Anmarkrud, Ø., & Bråten, I. (2022). Effects of reading medium on the processing, comprehension, and calibration of adolescent readers. Computers & Education, 185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104520
- Ross, J., Scott Curwood, J., & Bell, A. (2020). A multimodal assessment framework for higher education. E-learning and Digital Media, 17(4), 290-306. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753020927201
- Sander, I. (2020). Critical big data literacy tools – Engaging citizens and promoting empowered internet usage. Data & Policy, 2(e5). https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2020.5
- Seargeant, P., & Tagg, C. (2018). Critical digital literacy education in the ‘fake news’ era. In K. Reedy & J. Parker (Eds.), Digital literacy unpacked (pp. 179-189). Facet. https://doi.org/10.29085/9781783301997.015
- Satar, M., Hauck, M., & Bilki, Z. (2023). Multimodal representation in virtual exchange: A social semiotic approach to critical digital literacy. Language Learning & Technology, 27(2), 72-96. https://doi.org/10125/73504
- Senkbeil, M. (2023). How well does the digital home learning environment predict ICT literacy and ICT self-efficacy? Comparing the predictive power of adolescent and parent reports. Computers & Education, 207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104937
- Serafini, F., & Gee, E. (2017). Introduction. In F. Serafini & E. Gee (Eds.), Remixing multiliteracies: Theory and practice from New London to new times. Teachers College Press.
- Shifman, L. (2014). Memes in digital culture. MIT Press.
- Singer, L.M., & Alexander, P.A. (2017). Reading across mediums: Effects of reading digital and print texts on comprehension and calibration. The Journal of Experimental Education, 85(1), 155-172.
- Singer, L.M., & Alexander, P.A. (2017). Reading on paper and digitally: What the past decades of empirical research reveal. Review of Educational Research [early view].
- Smythe, S. (2018). Adult learning in the control society: Digital era governance, literacies of control, and the work of adult educators. Adult Education Quarterly, 68(3), 197-214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713618766645
- Solon, O. (2017, Jul. 27). The future of fake news: Don’t believe everything you read, see or hear. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/jul/26/fake-news-obama-video-trump-face2face-doctored-content
- Son, J.-B. (2024). Insights into digital literacy in language teaching. Castledown.
- Southworth, J., & Migliaccio, K. (2023). Developing career-ready graduates: The importance of AI literacy across the curriculum. Media & Learning. https://media-and-learning.eu/type/featured-articles/developing-career-ready-graduates-the-importance-of-ai-literacy-across-the-curriculum/
- Starbird, K. (2017). Examining the alternative media ecosystem through the production of alternative narratives of mass shooting events on Twitter. Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Web and Social Media, ICWSM 2017, Montréal, Québec, Canada, May 15-18, 2017 (pp.230-239). AAAI Press. https://aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM17/paper/view/15603
- Støle, H., Mangen, A., & Schwippert, K. (2020). Assessing children’s reading comprehension on paper and screen: A mode-effect study. Computers & Education, 151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103861
- Stornaiuolo, A., Hull, G., & Hall, M. (2018). Cosmopolitan practices, networks, and flows of literacies. In K.A. Mills, A. Stornaiuolo, A. Smith & J. Zacher Pandya (Eds.), Handbook of writing, literacies, and education in digital cultures (pp.13-25). Routledge.
- Sun, M. (2016). Application of multimodal learning in online English teaching. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 10(4), 54-58. http://online-journals.org/index.php/i-jet/article/view/4697
- Tagg, C. (2015). Exploring digital communication: Language in action. Routledge.
- Tandoc, Jr., E.C. (2017). Audiences’ acts of authentication in the age of fake news: A conceptual framework. New Media & Society [early view].
- Toews, R. (2020, May 25). Deepfakes are going to wreak havoc on society. We are not prepared. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/robtoews/2020/05/25/deepfakes-are-going-to-wreak-havoc-on-society-we-are-not-prepared/
- Tour, E. (2019). Teaching digital literacies in EAL/ESL classrooms: Practical strategies. TESOL Journal, 11(1). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tesj.458
- Tour, K., et al. (2021). AMEP digital literacies framework and guide. https://bridges.monash.edu/articles/educational_resource/AMEP_Digital_Literacies_Framework_and_Guide_pdf/20493207/3
- Tour, K., et al. (2023, Mar. 1). Settling in digital Australia. Impact. https://amesnews.com.au/latest-articles/settling-in-digital-australia/
- Trice, M., & Jones, J. (2020). The challenge of networked democracy. In J. Jones & M. Trice (Eds.), Platforms, protests, and the challenge of networked democracy. Rhetoric, politics and society. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36525-7_1
- Tzirides, A.-O., Carvalho de Castro, V., Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2024). (Multi-)literacies. In R. Hampel & U. Stickler (Eds.), The Bloomsbury handbook of language learning and technology (pp. 115-130). Bloomsbury.
- Wang, B., Rau, P.-L. P., & Yuan, T. (2023). Measuring user competence in using artificial intelligence: Validity and reliability of artificial intelligence literacy scale. Behaviour & Information Technology, 42(9), 1324-1337. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2022.2072768
- Wong, G. K. W., Ma, X., Dillenbourg, P., & Huan, J. (2020). Broadening artificial intelligence education in K-12: Where to start?. ACM Inroads, 11(1), 20-29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3381884
- Wardle, C. (2020). A new world disorder. Scientific American, 29(4), 40-45.
- Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017, Oct.). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. Council of Europe. https://edoc.coe.int/en/media-freedom/7495-information-disorder-toward-an-interdisciplinary-framework-for-research-and-policy-making.html
- Ware, P. (2017). Technology, new literacies, and language learners. In C.A. Chapelle & S. Sauro (Eds.), The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning (pp.265-277). John Wiley.
- Weikmann, T., & Lecheler, S. (2023). Visual disinformation in a digital age: A literature synthesis and research agenda. New Media & Society, 25(12), 3696-3713. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221141648
- Williams, M. (2019, Oct. 21). Culture can wait: The importance of data literacy. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/blogs/2019/10/culture-can-wait-the-importance-of-data-literacy
- Wollscheid, S., Sjaastad, J., & Tømte, C. (2016). The impact of digital devices vs. Pen(cil) and paper on primary school students’ writing skills – A research review. Computers & Education, 95, 19-35
- Yeh, H.-C., & Tseng, S.-S. (2020). Enhancing multimodal literacy using augmented reality. Language Learning & Technology, 24(1), 27-37. https://doi.org/10125/44706
- Yi, Y. (2021). Establishing the concept of AI literacy: Focusing on competence and purpose. European Journal of Bioethics, 12(2), 353-368. https://doi.org/10.21860/j.12.2.8
Digital wellness (Digital wellbeing/Mental health)
See also: Attention.
- Adachi-Mejia, A. M., Edwards, P. M., Gilbert-Diamond, D., Greenough, G. P., & Olson, A. L. (2014). TXT me I’m only sleeping: Adolescents with mobile phones in their bedroom. Family and Community Health, 37(4), 252-257.
- Barnwell, P. (2022, Mar. 8). Screen time in school: Finding the right balance for your classroom. Common Sense Education. https://www.commonsense.org/education/articles/screen-time-in-school-finding-the-right-balance-for-your-classroom
- Büchi, M. (2024). Digital well-being theory and research. New Media & Society, 26(1), 172-189. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211056851
- Bursztyn, L., Handel, B. R., Jimenez, R., & Roth, C. (2024). When product markets become collective traps: The case of social media. Working paper 31771. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w31771#
- Chatfield, T. (2015). Live this book! Penguin.
- Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. (2019). The costs of connection: How data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford University Press.
- Denworth, L. (2019, Nov.). The kids are all right. Scientific American, 321(5), 44-49.
- Dudley-Nicholson, J. (2015, Jan. 21). Limiting a child’s screen time to less than two hours ‘virtually impossible’ and requires a rethink. Perth Now. http://www.perthnow.com.au/lifestyle/parenting/limiting-a-childs-screen-time-to-less-than-two-hours-virtually-impossible-and-requires-a-rethink/story-fnhqguxr-1227192313073
- Gazdecki, A. (2022, May 24). The art of switching off: How to do more by doing less. ReadWrite. https://readwrite.com/the-art-of-switching-off-how-to-do-more-by-doing-less/
- Ging, D., & Garvey, S. (2017). ‘Written in these scars are the stories I can’t explain’: A content analysis of pro-ana and thinspiration image sharing on Instagram. New Media & Society [early view].
- Greenfield, S. (2014). Mind change: How digital technologies are leaving their mark on our brains. Rider.
- Hesselberth, P. (2017). Discourses on disconnectivity and the right to disconnect. New Media & Society [early view].
- Hoffner, C.A., Lee, S., & Park, S.J. (2016). ‘I miss my mobile phone!’: Self-expansion via mobile phone and responses to phone loss. New Media & Society, 18(11), 2452-2468.
- Kuss, D. J. , & Pontes, H. M. (2019). Internet addiction. Hogrefe.
- Lemon, N., Francis, J., & Baker, L. M. (2024). Well-being literacy in the academic landscape: Trioethnographic inquiry into scholarly writing. Brock Education Journal, 33(1), 27-48. https://doi.org/10.26522/brocked.v33i1.1120
- Levy, D.M. (2016). Mindful tech: How to bring balance to our digital lives. Yale University Press.
- Lister, K., Riva, E., Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Fox, C. (2022, Aug. 17). Participatory digital approaches to embedding student wellbeing in higher education. Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.924868
- Madden, M., Calvin, A., & Hasse, A. (2024). A double-edged sword: How diverse communities of young people think about the multifaceted relationship between social media and mental health. Common Sense/Hopelab. https://www.commonsensemedia.org/research/double-edged-sword-how-diverse-communities-of-young-people-think-about-social-media-and-mental-health
- Martin, P. (2024, Jul. 23). Would you pay to quit TikTok and Instagram? You’d be surprised how many would. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/would-you-pay-to-quit-tiktok-and-instagram-youd-be-surprised-how-many-would-235180
- Melo, C., Madariaga, L., Nussbaum, M., Heller, R., Bennett, S., Tsai, C.-C., & van Braak, J. (2020). Editorial: Educational technology and addictions. Computers & Education, 145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103730
- Orlando, J. (2020, Apr. 10). Forget old screen ‘time’ rules during coronavirus. Here’s what you should focus on instead. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/forget-old-screen-time-rules-during-coronavirus-heres-what-you-should-focus-on-instead-135053
- Pelletier, K., et al. (2023). EDUCAUSE Horizon Report: Holistic Student Experience Edition. EDUCAUSE. https://library.educause.edu/resources/2023/10/2023-educause-horizon-report-holistic-student-experience-edition
- Robertson, R. S., & Johnson, M. K. (2023). Moral education in and for virtual spaces. In D. W. Yacek, M. E. Jonas & K. H. Gary (Eds.), Moral education in the 21st century (pp. 231-259). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009170291.016
- Siegel, D. (2015). This is what happens to your brain and body when you check your smartphone before bed. Business Insider.
http://www.businessinsider.com/health-brain-body-smartphone-before-bed-2015-4 - Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books.
- Turkle, S. (2015). Reclaiming conversation: The power of talk in a digital age. Penguin.
- The US Surgeon General. (2023). Social media and youth mental health: The US Surgeon General’s advisory. https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/sg-youth-mental-health-social-media-advisory.pdf
Environment (E-waste)
- Belkhir, L., & Elmeligi, A. (2018). Assessing ICT global emissions footprint: Trends to 2040 and recommendations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 177, 448-463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.239
- Bloomberg. (2024, Jun. 22). AI is already wreaking havoc on global power systems. Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2024-ai-data-centers-power-grids/
- Calma, J. (2024, Jan. 25). AI and crypto mining are driving up data centers’ energy use. The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2024/1/24/24049047/data-center-ai-crypto-bitcoin-mining-electricity-report-iea
- Calma, J. (2024, May 16). Microsoft’s AI obsession is jeopardizing its climate ambitions. The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2024/5/15/24157496/microsoft-ai-carbon-footprint-greenhouse-gas-emissions-grow-climate-pledge
- Cooper, T., Shapley, M., & Cole, C. (2020). Mobile phone waste and the circular economy. In R. Ling, L. Fortunati, G. Goggin, S. S. Lim & Y. Li (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of mobile communication and society (pp. 601-620). Oxford University Press.
- Crawford, K. (2021). The atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. Yale University Press.
- Crawford, K. (2024, Feb. 20). Generative AI’s environmental costs are soaring – and mostly secret. Nature. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-00478-x
- Erdenesanaa, D. (2023, Oct. 11). A.I. could soon need as much electricity as an entire country. The New York Times, p. A8. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/10/climate/ai-could-soon-need-as-much-electricity-as-an-entire-country.html
- Hao, K. (2019, Jun. 6). Training a single AI model can emit as much carbon as five cars in their lifetimes. MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/2019/06/06/239031/training-a-single-ai-model-can-emit-as-much-carbon-as-five-cars-in-their-lifetimes/
- Hao, K. (2024, Mar. 1). AI is taking water from the desert. The Atlantic Monthly. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2024/03/ai-water-climate-microsoft/677602/
- Kilvert, N. (2021, Oct. 14). E-waste surges in 2021 as world sends goldmine to landfill. ABC News. https://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2021-10-14/e-waste-electronics-landfill-gold-landfill-recycling/100524744
- Knox, J. (2019). What does the ‘postdigital’ mean for education? Three critical perspectives on the digital, with implications for educational research and practice. Postdigital Science and Education, 1, 357-370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-019-00045-y
- Kukulska-Hulme, A., Wise, A. F., Coughlan, T., Biswas, G., Bossu, C., Burriss, S. K., Charitonos, K., et al. (2024). Innovating Pedagogy 2024. The Open University. https://iet.open.ac.uk/files/innovating-pedagogy-2024.pdf
- Livingstone, G. (2023, Jul. 11). ‘It’s pillage’: Thirsty Uruguayans decry Google’s plan to exploit water supply. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jul/11/uruguay-drought-water-google-data-center
- Macgilchrist, F. (2021). Rewilding technology. On Education, 12. https://www.oneducation.net/no-12_december-2021/rewilding-technology/
- Moss, S. (2019, Nov. 27). Pointless emails: They’re not just irritating – they have a massive carbon footprint. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/shortcuts/2019/nov/26/pointless-emails-theyre-not-just-irritating-they-have-a-massive-carbon-footprint
- Nardi, B., Tomlinson, B., Patterson, D. J., Chen, J., Pargman, D., Raghavan, B., & Penzenstadler, B. (2018). Computing within limits. Communications of the ACM, 61(10), 86-93. https://doi.org/10.1145/3183582
- Osiko, A. (2022, Nov. 15). Tackling the fastest growing waste stream: E-waste. GSMA Mobile for Development. https://www.gsma.com/mobilefordevelopment/blog/tackling-the-fastest-growing-waste-stream-e-waste/
- Perrotta, C., Lim, C. P., Selwyn, N., Bennett, S., Dalgarno, B., Brown, C., Pillay, H., Jeong, H-S., Hunter, J., Pangrazio, L., Carvalho, L., Hartnett, M., Pegrum, M., Henderson, M., Twining, P., Dawson, P., Buchanan, R., Howard, S., & Prestridge, S. (2022). Consultation for the 2023 GEM Report on technology and education with a focus on the Asia-Pacific region. Faculty of Education Working Paper #1. Monash University. https://doi.org/10.26180/21114046
- Pitron, G. (2023). The dark cloud: How the digital world is costing the earth. Scribe.
- Selwyn, N. (2021). Ed-tech within limits: Anticipating educational technology in times of environmental crisis. E-learning and Digital Media, 18(5), 496-510. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530211022951
- Selwyn, N., & Aagaard, J. (2021). Banning mobile phones from classrooms – An opportunity to advance understandings of technology addiction, distraction and cyberbullying. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(1), 8-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12943
- US Dept of Labor. (n.d.). From artisanal mines to electric cars: How does cobalt mined with child labor end up in rechargeable lithium-ion batteries? Exposing exploitation in global supply chains. https://www.dol.gov/agencies/ilab/reports/child-labor/list-of-goods/supply-chains/lithium-ion-batteries
- Verma, P., & Tan, S. (2024, Sep. 18). A bottle of water per email: the hidden environmental costs of using AI chatbots. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2024/09/18/energy-ai-use-electricity-water-data-centers/
- Vincent, J. (2024, Feb. 16). How much electricity does AI consume? The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/24066646/ai-electricity-energy-watts-generative-consumption
- Werse, N. R. (2023). The quest to cultivate an ecocritical awareness in educational technology scholarship: A question of disciplinary focus in the age of environmental crisis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54, 1878-1894. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13327
E-portfolios
- Andrews, T., & Cole, C. (2015). Two steps forward, one step back: The intricacies of engaging with eportfolios in nursing undergraduate education. Nurse Education Today, 35, 568-572.
- Barrett, H. (ongoing). E-portfolios for learning. http://eportfoliosblog.blogspot.com.au/
- Briggs, S. (2018, Jan. 18). Blockchain technology: Can it change education? informED. https://www.opencolleges.edu.au/informed/edtech-integration/blockchain-technology-education/
- Burt, R., & Morris, K. (2020, Jun. 12). The complete guide to student digital portfolios. Campus Press. https://campuspress.com/student-digital-portfolios-guide/
- Campbell, D.M., et al. (2014). Electronic portfolios. In D.M. Campbell et al, How to develop a professional portfolio: A manual for teachers (6th ed., pp.88-96.). Pearson.
- Chang, C.-C., et al. (2014). Using e-portfolios to elevate knowledge amassment among university students. Computers & Education, 72, 187-195.
- Eynon, B., Gambino, L., & Török, J. (2014). Completion, quality, and change: The difference e-portfolios make. Peer Review, 16(1). https://www.aacu.org/publications-research/periodicals/completion-quality-and-change-difference-e-portfolios-make
- Haverkamp, J.J., & Vogt, M. (2015). Beyond academic evidence: Innovative uses of technology within e-portfolios in a Doctor of Nursing Practice program. Journal of Professional Nursing, 31(4), 284-289.
- Lim, C.P., & Lee, J. C.-K. (2014). Teaching e-portfolios and the development of professional learning communities (PLCs) in higher education institutions. Internet and Higher Education, 20, 57-59.
- Oakley, G., Pegrum, M., & Johnston, S. (2014). Introducing e-portfolios to pre-service teachers as tools for reflection and growth: Lessons learnt. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 42(1), 36-50.
- Pegrum, M. (ongoing). E-portfolios. Digital learning. http://wp.me/P8xJjA-1rP
- Rafeldt, L.A., Bader, H.J., Lesnick Czarzasty, N., Freeman, E., Ouellet, E., & Snayd, J.M. (2014). Reflection builds twenty-first-century professionals. Peer Review, 16(1). https://www.aacu.org/peerreview/2014/winter/reflection-builds-twenty-first-century-professionals
- Shroff, R., & Linger, W. (2015). Using mobile devices/smartphones to generate creative e-portfolio content. In D. Churchill, T.K.F. Chiu & N.J. Gu (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Mobile Learning Festival 2015: Mobile Learning, MOOCs and 21st Century Learning (pp.229-240). IMLF.
- Simatele, M. (2014). Enhancing the portability of employability skills using e-portfolios. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 39(6), 862-874.
- Trevitt, C., Macduff, A., & Steed, A. (2014). [e]portfolios for learning and as evidence of achievement: Scoping the academic practice development agenda ahead. Internet and Higher Education, 20, 69-78.
- Tur, G., & Marín, V.I. (2015). Exploring student students’ [sic] attitudes and beliefs towards e-portfolios and technology in education. Enseñanza & Teaching, 33(1), pp.57-82.
- Winberg, C., & Pallitt, N. (2016). “I am trying to practice good teaching”: Reconceptualizing eportfolios for professional development in vocational highereducation. British Journal of Educational Technology [early view].
- Yang, M., Tai, M., & Lim, C.P. (2015). The role of e-portfolios in supporting productive learning. British Journal of Educational Technology [early view].
Flipped approach
- Baepler, P., Walker, J.D., & Driessen, M. (2014). It’s not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education, 78, 227-236.
- Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. ISTE.
- Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2013/2014, Dec./Jan.). Flipping for mastery. Educational Leadership, 24-29.
- Chen, S-C., Yang, S.J.H., & Hsiao, C.-C. (2015). Exploring student perceptions, learning outcome and gender differences in a flipped mathematics course. British Journal of Educational Technology [early view].
- Chen, Y., et al. (2014). Is FLIP enough? Or should we use the FLIPPED model instead? Computers & Education, 79, 16-27.
- Chuang, H.-H., Weng, C.-Y., & Chen, C.-H. (2018). Which students benefit most from a flipped classroom approach to language learning? British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(1), 56-68.
- Clark, K.R. (2015). The effects of the flipped model of instruction on student engagement and performance in the secondary mathematics classroom. JEO, 12(1). http://www.thejeo.com/Archives/Volume12Number1/Clark.pdf
- COFA. (2014, Jul. 20). The flipped classroom. Learning to teach online. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-gQVgtNU4w
- EDUCAUSE. (2012). 7 things you should know about flipped classrooms. EDUCAUSE. http://www.educause.edu/library/resources/7-things-you-should-know-about-flipped-classrooms
- The Flipped Learning Network. (2014). Definition of flipped learning. Flip learning. http://flippedlearning.org/domain/46
- Howitt, C., & Pegrum, M. (2015). Implementing a flipped classroom approach in postgraduate education: An unexpected journey into pedagogical redesign. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(4), 458-469. http://ajet.org.au/index.php/AJET/article/view/2439
- Khan, S. (2012). The one world schoolhouse: Education reimagined. Hodder & Stoughton.
- Mehring, J., & Leis, A. (Eds.). (2018). Innovations in flipping the language classroom: Theories and practices. Springer.
- Sams, A. J. (2013). Flipped classroom meets mobile learning. In Z. L. Berge & L. Y. Muilenburg (Eds.), Handbook of mobile learning (pp. 259-267). Routledge.
- Wanner, T., & Palmer, E. (2015). Personalising learning: Exploring student and teacher perceptions about flexible learning and assessment in a flipped university course. Computers & Education, 88, 354-369.
- Yang, J., Yin, C., & Wang, W. (2018). Flipping the classroom in teaching Chinese as a foreign language. Language Learning & Technology, 22(1), 16-26. http://www.lltjournal.org/item/3027
Generative AI (ChatGPT)
See also: AI.
- Ahmad, N., Murugesan, S., & Kshetri, N. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence and the education sector. Computer, 56(6), 72-76. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2023.3263576
- Alang, N. (2024, Aug. 8). No god in the machine: The pitfalls of AI worship. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/news/article/2024/aug/08/no-god-in-the-machine-the-pitfalls-of-ai-worship
- Alm, A., & Ohashi, L. (2024). A worldwide study on language educators’ initial response to ChatGPT. Technology in Language Teaching & Learning, 6(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.29140/tltl.v6n1.1141
- Anthology. (2023). AI, academic integrity, and authentic assessment: An ethical path forward for education. https://www.anthology.com/paper/ai-academic-integrity-and-authentic-assessment-an-ethical-path-forward-for-education
- Ardito, C. G. (2024). Generative AI detection in higher education assessment. New Directions for Teaching and Learning [early view]. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20624
- Bae, H., & Bozkurt, A. (2024). The untold story of training students with generative AI: Are we preparing students for true learning or just personalization? Online Learning, Volume28(3), (1-9). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i3.4689
- Basgen, B. (2023, Aug. 15). A generative AI primer. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2023/8/a-generative-ai-primer
- Beals, J. (2024, Apr. 18). Grounding AI: Understanding the implications of generative AI in world language and culture education. FLTMAG. https://fltmag.com/implications-generative-ai/
- Bearman, M., & Ajjawi, R. (2023). Learning to work with the black box: Pedagogy for a world with artificial intelligence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(5), 1160-1173. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13337
- Bearman, M., & Ajjawi, R. (2024). When I say … artificial intelligence. Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.15408
- Bearman, M., Tai, J., Dawson, P., Boud, D., & Ajjawi, R. (2024). Developing evaluative judgement for a time of generative artificial intelligence. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2335321
- Beckingham, S., Lawrence, J., Powell, S., & Hartley, P. (2024). Sustainable and ethical GenAI for the common good. In S. Beckingham, J. Lawrence, S. Powell, & P. Hartley (Eds.). (2024). Using generative AI effectively in higher education: Sustainable and ethical practices for learning, teaching and assessment (pp. 127-138). Taylor & Francis.
- Bedford, J., Kim, M., & Qin, J. C. (2024). Confidence enhancer, learning equalizer, and pedagogical ally: Exploring GenAI for students with English as an additional language. In S. Beckingham, J. Lawrence, S. Powell, & P. Hartley (Eds.). (2024). Using generative AI effectively in higher education: Sustainable and ethical practices for learning, teaching and assessment (pp. 33-41). Taylor & Francis.
- Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? FAccT ’21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pp. 610-623. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922
- Bloomberg. (2024, Jun. 22). AI is already wreaking havoc on global power systems. Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2024-ai-data-centers-power-grids/
- Bogost, I. (2023, Feb. 3). ChatGPT is about to dump more work on everyone. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2023/02/chatgpt-ai-detector-machine-learning-technology-bureaucracy/672927/
- Bridle, J. (2023, Mar. 16). The stupidity of AI. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/mar/16/the-stupidity-of-ai-artificial-intelligence-dall-e-chatgpt
- Butler, J., Jaffe, S., Baym, N., Czerwinski, M., Iqbal, S., Nowak, K., Rintel, R., Sellen, A., Vorvoreanu, M., Hecht, B., & Teevan, J. (Eds.). Microsoft New Future of Work Report 2023. Microsoft Research Tech Report MSRTR-2023-34. https://aka.ms/nfw2023
- Cazzaniga, M., et al. (2024). Gen-AI: Artificial intelligence and the future of work. IMF. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/Staff-Discussion-Notes/Issues/2024/01/14/Gen-AI-Artificial-Intelligence-and-the-Future-of-Work-542379
- Chen, L., Zaharia, M., & Zou, J. (2023). How is ChatGPT’s behavior changing over time? arXiv 2307.09009. https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.09009
- Chen, M. R. A. (2024). The AI chatbot interaction for semantic learning: A collaborative note-taking approach with EFL students. Language Learning & Technology, 28(1), 1-25. https://hdl.handle.net/10125/73586
- Chiang, T. (2023, Feb. 9). ChatGPT is a blurry jpeg of the web. The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/tech/annals-of-technology/chatgpt-is-a-blurry-jpeg-of-the-web
- Chiu, T. K. F., Xia, Q., Zhou, X., Chai, C. S., & Cheng, M. (2023). Systematic literature review on opportunities, challenges, and future research recommendations of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100118
- Clarke, S., Milmo, D., & Blight, G. (2023, Nov. 1). How AI chatbots like ChatGPT or Bard work – Visual explainer. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/ng-interactive/2023/nov/01/how-ai-chatbots-like-chatgpt-or-bard-work-visual-explainer
- Cochrane, T. (2023). ChatGPT proofing assessment design. Padlet. https://unimelb.padlet.org/tccoch/chatgpt-proofing-assessment-design-9q483kxz9x0s9g7h
- Cooper, G. (2023). Examining science education in ChatGPT: An exploratory study of generative artificial intelligence. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32, 444–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10039-y
- Cooper, G., & Tang, KS. (2024). Pixels and pedagogy: Examining science education imagery by generative artificial intelligence. Journal of Science Education and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-024-10104-0
- Crawford, K. (2024, Feb. 20). Generative AI’s environmental costs are soaring – and mostly secret. Nature. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-00478-x
- Dai, W., Lin, J., Jin, F., Li, T., Tsai, Y., Gasevic, D., & Chen, G. (2023). Can large language models provide feedback to students? A case study on ChatGPT. EdArXiv. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/hcgzj
- Dai, Y., Lai, S., Lim, C. P., & Liu, A. (2024). University policies on generative AI in Asia: Promising practices, gaps, and future directions, Journal of Asian Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2024.2379070
- Davidoff, M. (2024, Nov. 11). How broadening AI access can help bridge the digital divide. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2024/11/how-broadening-ai-access-can-help-bridge-the-digital-divide
- Dickinson, J. (2023, Mar. 17). An avalanche is really coming this time. Wonkhe. https://wonkhe.com/blogs/an-avalanche-really-is-coming-this-time/
- Dillon, A., et al. (2024). The use of large language model tools such as ChatGPT in academic writing in English medium education postgraduate programs: A grounded theory approach. The Journal of Educators Online, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2024.21.2.5
- EDUCAUSE. (2023, Dec. 6). 7 things you should know about … generative AI. The EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2023/12/7-things-you-should-know-about-generative-ai
- EDUCAUSE. (2024). AI … Friend or foe? EDUCAUSE SHOWCASE. https://www.educause.edu/showcase-series/2024/ai-friend-or-foe
- Farnell, A. (2023, Jan. 19). AI will replace academics unless our teaching challenges students again. Times Higher Education. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/opinion/ai-will-replace-academics-unless-our-teaching-challenges-students-again
- Franks, B. (2023, Apr. 26). Generative AI: It’s all a hallucination! Medium. https://medium.com/analytics-matters/generative-ai-its-all-a-hallucination-6b8798445044
- Furze, L. (2023, Dec. 18). The AI assessment scale: Version 2. Leon Furze. https://leonfurze.com/2023/12/18/the-ai-assessment-scale-version-2/
- Gattupalli, S., Maloy, R. W., & Edwards, S. A. (2023). Prompt literacy: A pivotal educational skill in the age of AI. ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst: College of Education Working Papers and Reports Series, University of Massachusetts Amherst. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/education_working_papers/6/
- Giannini, S. (2023, Jul.) Generative AI and the future of education. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000385877
- Gates, B. (2023, Jul. 11). The risks of AI are real but manageable. GatesNotes. https://www.gatesnotes.com/The-risks-of-AI-are-real-but-manageable
- Godwin-Jones, R. (2023). Emerging spaces for language learning: AI bots, ambient intelligence, and the metaverse. Language Learning & Technology, 27(2), 6-27. https://doi.org/10125/73501
- Godwin-Jones, R. (2024). Distributed agency in language learning and teaching through generative AI. Language Learning & Technology, 28(2), 5-31. https://doi.org/10125/73570
- Gonzalez, L., et al. (2024, Aug. 15). Leveraging generative AI for inclusive excellence in higher education. The EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2024/8/leveraging-generative-ai-for-inclusive-excellence-in-higher-education
- Gray, A. (2024). ChatGPT ‘contamination’: Estimating the prevalence of LLMs in the scholarly literature. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.16887
- Grove, J. (2023, Mar. 16). The ChatGPT revolution of academic research has begun. Times Higher Education. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/depth/chatgpt-revolution-academic-research-has-begun
- Guo, K., & Li, D. (2024). Understanding EFL students’ use of self-made AI chatbots as personalized writing assistance tools: A mixed methods study. System, 124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103362
- Halpern, S. (2023, Mar. 28). What we still don’t know about how AI is trained. The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/what-we-still-dont-know-about-how-ai-is-trained
- Hartmann, J., Schwenzow, & Witte, M. (2023). The political ideology of conversational AI: Converging evidence on ChatGPT’s pro-environmental, left-libertarian orientation. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.01768
- Harari, Y. N. (2023, Apr. 28). Yuval Noah Harari argues that AI has hacked the operating system of human civilisation. The Economist. https://www.economist.com/by-invitation/2023/04/28/yuval-noah-harari-argues-that-ai-has-hacked-the-operating-system-of-human-civilisation
- Hartley, P., Beckingham, S., Lawrence, J., & Powell, S. (2024). Using generative AI effectively in higher education. In. S. Beckingham, J. Lawrence, S. Powell, & P. Hartley (Eds.), Using generative AI effectively in higher education: Sustainable and ethical practices for learning, teaching and assessment (pp. 1-7). Taylor & Francis.
- Henrickson, L. (2021). Reading computer-generated texts. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108906463
- Herft, A. (2023). A Teacher’s Prompt Guide to ChatGPT aligned with ‘What Works Best’. https://drive.google.com/file/d/15qAxnUzOwAPwHzoaKBJd8FAgiOZYcIxq/view
- Hern, A. (2024, Apr. 16). TechScape: How cheap, outsourced labour in Africa is shaping AI English. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/apr/16/techscape-ai-gadgest-humane-ai-pin-chatgpt
- Hetler, A. (2023, Sep. 15). Conversational AI vs. generative AI: What’s the difference? TechTarget. https://www.techtarget.com/whatis/feature/Conversational-AI-vs-generative-AI-Whats-the-difference
- Hibbert, M., Altman, E., & Shippen, T. (2024, Jun. 3). A framework for AI literacy. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2024/6/a-framework-for-ai-literacy
- Hughes, A. (2023, Feb. 2). ChatGPT: Everything you need to know about OpenAI’s GPT-3 tool. BBC Science Focus. https://www.sciencefocus.com/future-technology/gpt-3/
- Jiang, Y., Hao, J., Fauss, M., & Li, C. (2024). Detecting ChatGPT-generated essays in a large-scale writing assessment: Is there a bias against non-native English speakers? Computers & Education, 217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105070
- Khan, S. (2024). Brave new words: How AI will revolutionize education. Viking.
- Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for language teaching and learning. RELC Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368822311628
- Koplin, J. (2024, May 13). AI-assisted writing is quietly booming in academic journals. Here’s why that’s OK. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/ai-assisted-writing-is-quietly-booming-in-academic-journals-heres-why-thats-ok-229416
- Leaver, T., & Srdarov, S. (2023). ChatGPT isn’t magic : The hype and hypocrisy of generative artificial intelligence (AI) rhetoric. M/C Journal, 26(5). https://doi.org/10.5204/mcj.3004
- Li, P., et al. (2023). Making AI less ‘thirsty’: Uncovering and addressing the secret water footprint of AI models. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.03271
- Li, Z., Wang, C., & Bonk, C. J. (2024). Exploring the utility of ChatGPT for self-directed online language learning. Online Learning, 28(3). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i3.4497
- Liang, W., Yuksekgonul, M., Mao, Y., Wu, E., & Zou, J. (2023). GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writers. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.02819
- Liang, W., Zhang, Y., et al. (2023). Can large language models provide useful feedback on research papers? A large-scale empirical analysis. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.01783
- Liu, W. (2023, Mar. 28). AI is exposing who really has power in Silicon Valley. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2023/03/open-ai-products-labor-profit/673527/
- Liu, D., & Bridgeman, A. (2023, Jun. 8). ChatGPT is old news: How do we assess in the age of AI writing co-pilots? Teaching@Sydney. https://educational-innovation.sydney.edu.au/teaching@sydney/chatgpt-is-old-news-how-do-we-assess-in-the-age-of-ai-writing-co-pilots/
- Liu, M., Zhang, L. J., & Biebricher, C. (2024). Investigating students’ cognitive processes in generative AI-assisted digital multimodal composing and traditional writing. Computers & Education, 211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104977
- Lo, C. K., Hew, K. F., & Jong, M. S.-Y. (2024). The influence of ChatGPT on student engagement: A systematic review and future research agenda. Computers & Education, 219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105100
- Lodge, J. M., Thompson, K., & Corrin, L. (2023). Mapping out a research agenda for generative artificial intelligence in tertiary education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 39(1). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.8695
- Lott, M. (2023, Dec. 17). My new tool to track AI bias: TrackingAI.org. Maximum Truth. https://www.maximumtruth.org/p/my-new-tool-to-track-ai-bias-trackingaiorg
- Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000386693
- Miao, F., & Cukurova, M. (2024). AI competency framework for teachers. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000391104
- Miao, F., & Shiohira, K. (2024). AI competency framework for students. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000391105
- Mirzadeh, I., Alizadeh, K., Shahrokhi, H., Tuzel, O., Bengio, S., & Farajtabar, M. (2024). GSM-Symbolic: Understanding the limitations of mathematical reasoning in large language models. arXiv.
- https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.05229
- Mishra, P. (2023, Mar. 2). ChatGPT3 is a bulls*** artist. Punya Mishra. https://punyamishra.com/2023/03/02/chatgpt3-is-bulls-artist/
- Mishra, P., Warr, M., & Islam, R. (2023). TPACK in the age of ChatGPT and generative AI. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 39(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2023.2247480
- Mollick, E. (2024). Co-intelligence: Living and working with AI. W. H. Allen.
- Moorhouse, B. L., & Kohnke, L. (2024). The effects of generative AI on initial language teacher education: The perceptions of teacher educators. System, 122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103290
- Moorhouse, B. L., Wan, Y., Wu, C., Kohnke, L., Ho, T. Y., & Kwong, T. (2024). Developing language teachers’ professional generative AI competence: An intervention study in an initial language teacher education course. System, 125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103399
- Munoz, A., Wilson, A., Pereira Nunes, B., Del Medico, C., Slade, C., Bennett, D., et al. (2023). AAIN generative artificial intelligence guidelines. Australian Academic Integrity Network (AAIN) Generative AI Working Group. https://doi.org/10.26187/sbwr-kq49
- Nelson, J. (2023, Apr. 13). Perplexity AI: The chatbot stepping up to challenge ChatGPT. Decrypt. https://decrypt.co/126127/review-perplexity-ai-the-chatbot-stepping-up-to-challenge-chatgpt
- Norris, T. (2024). AI is the perfect student: Anthropocene, Technocene, and the ends of intelligence. Brock Education Journal, 33(3). https://doi.org/10.26522/brocked.v33i3.1172
- O’Connell, A. J. (2024, Feb. 7). How (and why) the University of Michigan built its own closed generative AI tools. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2024/2/how-and-why-the-university-of-michigan-built-its-own-closed-generative-ai-tools
- Ohashi, L. (2023, Mar. 1). Rethinking education in the age of AI. MindBrainEd Think Tank+, 9(3). https://www.mindbrained.org/2023/03/rethinking-education-in-the-age-of-ai/
- Ohashi, L., & Alm, A. (2023). ChatGPT and language learning: University educators’ initial response. In CALL for all Languages – EUROCALL 2023 Short Papers. 15-18 August 2023, University of Iceland, Reykjavik. https://doi.org/10.4995/EuroCALL2023.2023.16917
- Ou, A. W., Stöhr, C., & Malmström, H. (2024). Academic communication with AI-powered language tools in higher education: From a post-humanist perspective. System, 121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103225
- Owston, R. (2024, Jun. 12). Personalized AI tutoring as a social activity: Paradox or possibility? The EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2024/6/personalized-ai-tutoring-as-a-social-activity-paradox-or-possibility
- Pegrum, M. (ongoing). Generative AI. Digital Learning. https://markpegrum.com/tools-for-digital-learning/generative-ai/
- Perkins, M., Roe, J., Vu, B. H., et al. (2024). Simple techniques to bypass GenAI text detectors: Implications for inclusive education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00487-w
- Peters, M. A., Jackson, L., Papastephanou, M., Jandric, P., Lazaroiu, G., Evers, C. W., Cope, B., Kalantzis, M., et al. (2024). AI and the future of humanity: ChatGPT-4, philosophy and education – Critical responses. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 56(9), 828-862. https://doi.org./10.1080/00131857.2023.2213437
- Purtill, J. (2023, Jan. 25). How ChatGPT and other new AI tools are being used by lawyers, architects and coders. ABC News. https://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2023-01-25/chatgpt-midjourney-generative-ai-and-future-of-work/101882580
- Robert, J., & Muscanell, N. (2023). 2023 EDUCAUSE Horizon Action Plan: Generative AI. EDUCAUSE. https://library.educause.edu/resources/2023/9/2023-educause-horizon-action-plan-generative-ai
- Rozado D. (2023). The political biases of ChatGPT. Social Sciences, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12030148
- Sabzalieva, E., & Valentini, A. (2023). ChatGPT and artificial intelligence in higher education: Quick start guide. UNESCO/UNESCO IESALC. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000385146
- Sadasivan, V. S., Kumar, A., Balasubramanian, S., Wang, W., & Feizi, S. (2023). Can AI-generated text be reliably detected? arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.11156
- Saunders, S., Coulby, C., & Lindsay, R. (2024). Pedagogy and policy in a brave new world: A case study on the development of generative AI literacy at the University of Liverpool. In S. Beckingham, J. Lawrence, S. Powell, & P. Hartley, P. (Eds.). Using generative AI effectively in higher education: Sustainable and ethical practices for learning, teaching and assessment (pp. 11-20). Taylor & Francis.
- Sharples, M. (2023). Generative AI and education futures (video). UCL. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/teaching-learning/case-studies/2023/aug/generative-ai-and-education-futures
- Sharples, M. (2023). Towards social generative AI for education: Theory, practices and ethics. Learning: Research and Practice, 9(2), 159-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2023.2261131
- Si, C., Yang, SD., & Hashimoto, T. (2024). Can LLMs generate novel research ideas? A large-scale human study with 100+ NLP researchers. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.04109
- Slater, J., Humphries, J., & Townsen Hicks, M. (2024, Jul. 17). ChatGPT isn’t ‘hallucinating’ – It’s bullshitting! Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/chatgpt-isnt-hallucinating-its-bullshitting/
- Solove, D. J., Hartzog, W. (2024, Jan. 5). Kafka in the age of AI and the futility of privacy as control Boston University Law Review 1021. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4685553
- Sridhar, C. S. (2023, Jun. 1). Differences between conversational AI and generative AI. Purple Slate. https://www.purpleslate.com/differences-between-conversational-ai-and-generative-ai/
- Stodd, J., Schatz, S., Stead, G., et al. (2023). Engines of engagement. Sea Salt Learning. https://seasaltlearning.com/engines-of-engagement-generative-ai-book/
- Tai, T.-Y., & Chen, H. H.-J. (2024). Improving elementary EFL speaking skills with generative AI chatbots: Exploring individual and paired interactions. Computers & Education, 220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105112
- Tang, K. S., & Cooper, G. (2024). The role of materiality in an era of generative artificial intelligence. Science & Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00508-0
- Tang, K. S., Cooper, G., & Nielsen, W. (2024). Philosophical, legal, ethical, and practical considerations in the emerging use of generative AI in academic journals: Guidelines for Research in Science Education (RISE). Research in Science Education, 54, 797-807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-024-10192-3
- TEQSA. (2023). Artificial intelligence. Higher education good practice hub. https://www.teqsa.gov.au/guides-resources/higher-education-good-practice-hub/artificial-intelligence
- Trust T., Whalen, J., & Mouza, C. (2023). ChatGPT: Challenges, Opportunities, and Implications for Teacher Education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 23(1), 1-23. https://citejournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/v23i1editorial1.pdf
- UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/guidance-generative-ai-education-and-research
- https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/issues/business/b-tech/taxonomy-GenAI-Human-Rights-Harms.pdf
- UNICEF Digital Technology. (2023, Mar. 28). Beyond ChatGPT: What are the opportunities and risks of advanced artificial intelligence (AI) systems for child rights? LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/beyond-chatgpt-what-opportunities-risks-advanced-artificial/
- University of Copenhagen. (2023, Jul. 10). ChatGPT promotes American norms and values. University of Copenhagen. https://news.ku.dk/all_news/2023/07/chatgpt-promotes-american-norms-and-values/
- UN OHCHR. (2024). Taxonomy of human rights risks connected to generative AI. https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/issues/business/b-tech/taxonomy-GenAI-Human-Rights-Harms.pdf
- Urban, M., Děchtěrenko, F., Lukavský, J., Hrabalová, V., Svacha, F., Brom, C., & Urban, K. (2024). ChatGPT improves creative problem-solving performance in university students: An experimental study. Computers & Education, 215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105031
- Verma, P., & Tan, S. (2024, Sep. 18). A bottle of water per email: the hidden environmental costs of using AI chatbots. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2024/09/18/energy-ai-use-electricity-water-data-centers/
- Walker Rettberg, J. (2022, Dec. 6). ChatGPT is multilingual but monocultural, and it’s learning your values. jill/txt. https://jilltxt.net/right-now-chatgpt-is-multilingual-but-monocultural-but-its-learning-your-values/
- Walker Rettberg, J. (2024, Jan. 16). How generative AI endangers cultural narratives. Issues in Science and Technology. https://issues.org/generative-ai-cultural-narratives-rettberg/
- Wang, B., Rau, P.-L. P., & Yuan, T. (2023). Measuring user competence in using artificial intelligence: Validity and reliability of artificial intelligence literacy scale. Behaviour & Information Technology, 42(9), 1324-1337. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2022.2072768
- Warschauer, M, & Xu, Y. (2024). Generative AI for language learning: Entering a new era. Language Learning & Technology, 28(2), 1-4. https://hdl.handle.net/10125/73569
- Warzel, C. (2023, Feb. 9). The most important job skill of this century. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2023/02/openai-text-models-google-search-engine-bard-chatbot-chatgpt-prompt-writing/672991/
- Williamson, B. (2024, Feb. 22). AI in education is a public problem. Code Acts in Education. https://codeactsineducation.wordpress.com/2024/02/22/ai-in-education-is-a-public-problem/
- Williamson, B., Macgilchrist, F., & Potter, J. (2023) Re-examining AI, automation and datafication in education. Learning, Media and Technology, 48(1), 1-5. https://10.1080/17439884.2023.2167830
- Wolfram, C. (2023, Mar. 23). Game over for Maths A-level. Conrad Wolfram. https://www.conradwolfram.com/writings/game-over-for-maths-a-level
- Woo, D. J., Susanto, H., Yeung, C. H., Guo, K., & Fung, A. K. Y. (2024). Exploring AI-generated text in student writing: How does AI help? Language Learning & Technology, 28(2), 183-209. https://hdl.handle.net/10125/73577
- Yang, L., & Li, R. (2024). ChatGPT for L2 learning: Current status and implications. System, 124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103351
- Yang, Z., Wu, J. G., & Xie, H. (2024): Taming Frankenstein’s monster: Ethical considerations relating to generative artificial intelligence in education. Asia Pacific Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2023.2300137
- Yin, W. J. (2024, Jan. 24). Will our educational system keep pace with AI? A student’s perspective on AI and learning. The EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2024/1/will-our-educational-system-keep-pace-with-ai-a-students-perspective-on-ai-and-learning
- Acharya, B. N., & Rana, K. (2024). How students and teachers voyaged from physical classroom to Emergency Remote Teaching in COVID-19 crisis: A case of Nepal. E-Learning and Digital Media, 21(2), 125-140. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530231156166
- Adam, T. (2019) Digital neocolonialism and massive open online courses (MOOCs): Colonial pasts and neoliberal futures. Learning, Media and Technology, 44(3), 365-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2019.1640740
- Azeitero, U. M., et al. (Eds.) (2015). E-learning and education for sustainability. Peter Lang.
- British Council. (2015). Technology for professional development: Access, interest and opportunity for teachers of English in South Asia. Research report. British Council. http://englishagenda.britishcouncil.org/sites/ec/files/Digital%20Teachers%20Report_FINAL_LOW_RES.pdf
- Garrett, F., et al. (2019). At the edge of the internet: Teaching coding and sustainability to Himalayan girls. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 45(3). https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt27864
- GIZ. (2019). eLearning Africa Report 2019. https://www.elearning-africa.com/media_publications_report_2019.php
- Hamilton, Z., Downer, M., & Acland, S. (2022). The digital worlds of displacement-affected communities: A cross-context study of how people affected by displacement use mobile phones. GSMA & UNHCR. https://www.gsma.com/mobilefordevelopment/the-digital-worlds-of-displacement-affected-communities/
- Hennessy, S., D’Angelo, S., McIntyre, N., Koomar, S., Kreimeia, A., Cao, L., Brugha, M., & Zubairi, A. (2024). Technology use for teacher professional development in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Computers and Education Open, 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100080
- Hockly, N., Traxler, J., Johnson, M., et al. (2021). Supporting departments and ministries of education in Southern Africa with the remote delivery of English language teaching and learning during Covid-19: An evaluation of the impact of the ‘Learn on WhatsApp’ and ‘Learn on DBE TV’ projects. British Council. https://www.britishcouncil.org.za/sites/default/files/bc_leap_me_report.pdf
- McDougall, P., Groenestege, M. T., Lindsey, D., & Sibthorpe, C. (2022, Sep.). Policy considerations to accelerate digital inclusion for women in low- and middle income countries. GSMA. https://www.gsma.com/mobilefordevelopment/resources/policy-considerations-to-accelerate-digital-inclusion-for-women-in-low-and-middle-income-countries/
- Mitra, S. (2012). Beyond the hole in the wall: Discover the power of self-organized learning. TED Conferences.
- Ndibalema, P. (2022). Constraints of transition to online distance learning in Higher Education Institutions during COVID-19 in developing countries: A systematic review. E-Learning and Digital Media, 19(6), 595–618. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530221107510
- Pei, X., & Chib, A. (2021). Beyond the gender (dis)empowerment dichotomy: The mobile phone as social catalyst for gender transformation in the Global South. New Media & Society, 23(3), 578-595. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820905295
- Sarwari, K., Fawad Kakar, A., Golzar, J., & Abdullah Miri, M. (2022). Distance learning during COVID-19 in Afghanistan: Challenges and opportunities. E-learning and Digital Media, 19(2), 144-162. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530211044757
- Stark, L. (2020). Women, empowerment, and mobile phones in the developing world. In R. Ling, L. Fortunati, G. Goggin, S. S. Lim & Y. Li (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of mobile communication and society (pp. 529-543). Oxford University Press.
- Tamimi, N., Kienzler, H., Hammoudeh, W., Khalawi, H., Regent, M., & Giacaman, R. (2021). Towards decolonising research methods training: The development of a locally responsive online learning course on research methods for mental health in war and conflict for researchers and practitioners in the Gaza Strip. Global Mental Health 8(e42), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2021.40
- Thapaliya, M., Adhikari, S., & Rana, L. (2024). Opportunity in COVID-19 crisis: Moving away from chalk and talk to technology-integrated teaching in Nepalese higher education institutions. E-Learning and Digital Media, 21(1), 87-105. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530231153944
- Unwin, T. (2009). ICT4D: Information and communication technology for development. Cambridge University Press.
- Unwin, T. (2013). The internet and development: A critical perspective. In W. H. Dutton, The Oxford handbook of internet studies (pp. 531-554). Oxford University Press.
- Vosloo, S. (2018). Designing inclusive digital solutions and developing digital skills. UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0026/002655/265537E.pdf
- Werse, N. R. (2023). The quest to cultivate an ecocritical awareness in educational technology scholarship: A question of disciplinary focus in the age of environmental crisis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54, 1878-1894. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13327
- Zembylas, M. (2023). A decolonial approach to AI in higher education teaching and learning: strategies for undoing the ethics of digital neocolonialism. Learning, Media and Technology, 48(1), 25-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2021.2010094
- Bayraktar, B. (2020, May 12). Tip: “HyFlex” – Hybrid flexible blended mode. Tips for teaching professors. https://higheredpraxis.substack.com/p/cetl-tip-hyflex-hybrid-flexible-blended
- Blake, J. (2023, Jun. 21). Student and faculty perspectives on digital learning differ. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/tech-innovation/teaching-learning/2023/06/21/student-and-faculty-perspectives-digital-learning
- Bower, M., Lee, M.J.W., & Dalgarno, B. (2017). Collaborative learning across physical and virtual worlds: Factors supporting and constraining learners in a blended reality environment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 407-430.
- Columbia CTL. (n. d.). Hybrid/HyFlex teaching & learning. https://ctl.columbia.edu/resources-and-technology/teaching-with-technology/teaching-online/hyflex/
- Conner, C. (2022, Aug. 16). A face-to-face approach to the online learning space. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2022/8/a-face-to-face-approach-to-the-online-learning-space
- EDUCAUSE. (2023). Online, in-person, or hybrid? Yes. [Showcase series.] https://www.educause.edu/showcase-series/2023/online-in-person-hybrid-yes
- ELI. (2020). 7 things you should know about … the HyFlex course model. https://library.educause.edu/-/media/files/library/2020/7/eli7173.pdf
- Farmer, H. (2020, Aug. 18). 6 models for blended synchronous and asynchronous online course delivery. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/blogs/2020/8/6-models-for-blended-synchronous-and-asynchronous-online-course-delivery
- Guppy, N., Verpoorten, D., Boud, D., Lin, L., Tai, J., & Bartolic, S. (2022). The post-COVID-19 future of digital learning in higher education: Views from educators, students, and other professionals in six countries. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(6), 1750-1765. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13212
- Lenze, L., & Costello, M. (2023). Changed by our journey: Engaging students through simulive learning. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2023/4/changed-by-our-journey-engaging-students-through-simulive-learning
- Lin, T.-C. (2022). Student learning performance and satisfaction with traditional face-to-face classroom versus online learning: Evidence from teaching Statistics for Business. E-learning and Digital Media, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530211059625
- Martin, F., Polly, D., & Ritzhaupt, A. (2020, Sep. 8). Bichronous online learning. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/9/bichronous-online-learning-blending-asynchronous-and-synchronous-online-learning
- Martin, F., Swapna, K., Ritzhaupt, A., & Polly, D. (2024). Bichronous online learning: Perspectives, best practices, benefits, and challenges from award-winning online instructors. Online Learning, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i2.3945
- Noetel, M., Griffith, S., Delaney, O., Sanders, T., Parker, P., del Pozo Cruz, B., & Lonsdale, C. (2021). Video improves learning in higher education: A systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 91(2), 204-236. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654321990713
- Pellerin, M. (2024). Hybridization in the K-12 educational context and CALL for a digital and post-pandemic era. In R. Hampel & U. Stickler (Eds.), The Bloomsbury handbook of language learning and technology (pp. 431-445). Bloomsbury.
- Pelletier, K., et al. (2023). 2023 EDUCAUSE Horizon Report (Teaching and Learning Edition). EDUCAUSE. https://library.educause.edu/resources/2023/5/2023-educause-horizon-report-teaching-and-learning-edition
- Penrod, J. (2022, Mar. 25). Staying relevant: The importance of incorporating hyflex learning into higher education strategy. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2022/3/staying-relevant-the-importance-of-incorporating-hyflex-learning-into-higher-education-strategy
- Penrod, J. (2023, Feb. 22). Hybrid learning and space reimagination: Optimizing access and equity to promote student success. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2023/2/hybrid-learning-and-space-reimagination-optimizing-access-and-equity-to-promote-student-success
- Robert, J. (2022, Oct. 3). Modality preferences. In J. Robert, 2022 students and technology report: Rebalancing the student experience. https://www.educause.edu/ecar/research-publications/2022/students-and-technology-report-rebalancing-the-student-experience/modality-preferences
- Robert, J., & Pelletier, K. (2022). 2022 EDUCAUSE Horizon action plan: Hybrid learning.
EDUCAUSE. https://library.educause.edu/resources/2022/10/2022-educause-horizon-action-plan-hybrid-learning - Rutherford, J. (2023, Aug. 16). The design of hybrid teaching environments: 10 questions answered. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2023/8/the-design-of-hybrid-teaching-environments-10-questions-answered
- Samson, P. (2022, Mar. 1). Students often prefer in-person classes … until they don’t. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2022/3/students-often-prefer-in-person-classes-until-they-dont
- Stevens, G. J., Bienz, T., Wali, N., Condie, J., & Schismenos, S. (2021). Online university education is the new normal: But is face-to-face better? Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 18(3), 278-297. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-08-2020-0181
- Aleven, V., et al. (2017). Instruction based on adaptive learning technologies. In R. E. Mayer & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction (2nd ed., pp. 522-559). Routledge.
- Axelsen, M., Redmond, P., Henrich, E., & Henderson, M. (2020), Editorial: The evolving field of learning analytics research in higher education: From data analysis to theory generation, an agenda for future research. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6266
- boyd, d. (2016). Undoing the neutrality of big data. Florida Law Review Forum. http://www.floridalawreview.com/wp-content/uploads/Boyd_Response_Published.pdf
- boyd, d., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662-679.
- Briggs, S. (2014, Jan. 13). Big data in education: Big potential or big mistake? InformED. http://www.opencolleges.edu.au/informed/features/big-data-big-potential-or-big-mistake/
- Bucher, T. (2018). If … then: Algorithmic power and politics. Oxford University Press.
- Buckingham Shum, S. (2024). Editorial. Human-centred learning analytics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(3), 755-768. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13442
- Bull, S., & Wasson, B. (2016). Competence visualisation: Making sense of data from 21st-century technologies in language learning. ReCALL, 28(2), 147-165.
- Cechinel, C., Maldonado-Mahauad, J., Munoz, R., & Ochoa, X. (2024). Editorial. Evidence-based learning analytics: Reusing and reapplying successful methods and techniques in real learning settings. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(5), 1837-1840. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13506
- COFA. (2014, Jul. 20). Learning analytics to inform teaching practice. Learning to teach online. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LEivqxKKqt4
- Corrin, L., Scheffel, M., & Gašević, D. (2020). Editorial. Learning analytics: Pathways to impact. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(6). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6853
- Cukurova, M., Giannakos, M., & Martinez‐Maldonado, R. (2020). The promise and challenges of multimodal learning analytics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(5), 1441-1449. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13015
- Daniel, B. (2014). Big data and analytics in higher education: Opportunities and challenges. British Journal of Educational Technology [early view].
- de Freitas, S., Gibson, D., Du Plessis, C., Halloran, P., Williams, E., Ambrose, M., Dunwell, I., & Arnab, S. (2014). Foundations of dynamic learning analytics: Using university student data to increase retention. British Journal of Educational Technology [early view].
- D’Ignazio, C., & Klein, L. F. (2020). Data feminism. MIT Press.
- ELI. (2015). 7 things you should know about … personalized learning. EDUCAUSE. http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/eli7124.pdf
- ELI. (2017). 7 things you should know about … developments in learning analytics. https://library.educause.edu/resources/2017/7/7-things-you-should-know-about-developments-in-learning-analytics
- ELI [EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative]. (2019). 7 things you should know about … the comprehensive learner record. https://library.educause.edu/-/media/files/library/2019/1/eli7164.pdf
- Fain, P. (2014, 13 Jun.). Learning to adapt. Insider Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2014/06/13/profits-lead-way-adaptive-learning-becomes-more-popular
- Gelan, A., Fastré, G., Verjans, M., Martin, N., Janssenswillen, G., Creemers, M., Lieben, J., et al. (2018). Affordances and limitations of learning analytics for computer-assisted language learning: A case study of the VITAL project. Computer Assisted Language Learning [early view].
- Godwin-Jones, R. (2017). Data-informed language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 21(3), 9-27. http://www.lltjournal.org/item/3012
- Godwin-Jones, R. (2017). Scaling up and zooming in: Big data and personalization in language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 21(1), 4-15. http://www.lltjournal.org/item/2979
- Godwin-Jones, R. (2021). Big data and language learning: Opportunities and challenges. Language Learning & Technology, 25(1), 4-19. https://doi.org/10125/44747
- Griffiths, D., & Hoel, T. (2016). Comparing xAPI and Caliper. Learning Analytics Review 7. LACE. http://www.laceproject.eu/learning-analytics-review/lace-review-7_comparing-xapi-and-caliper/
- Guarcello, M., et al. (2021, Aug. 14). Discrimination in a sea of data: Exploring the ethical implications of student success analytics. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2021/8/discrimination-in-a-sea-of-data-exploring-the-ethical-implications-of-student-success-analytics
- Henke, N., et al. (2016, Dec.). The age of analytics: Competing in a data-driven world. McKinsey Global Institute. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/mckinsey-analytics/our-insights/the-age-of-analytics-competing-in-a-data-driven-world
- Jutting, C. (2016, Aug. 3). Universities are tracking their students: Is it clever or creepy? The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/2016/aug/03/learning-analytics-universities-data-track-students
- Kinshuk. (2015). Roadmap for adaptive and personalized learning in ubiquitous environments. In Kinshuk & R. Huang (Eds.), Ubiquitous learning environments and technologies (pp.1-13). Springer.
- Kukutai, T., & Taylor, J. (2016). Indigenous data sovereignty: Toward an agenda. Australian National University Press. https://press-files.anu.edu.au/downloads/press/n2140/pdf/book.pdf
- Lan, Y.-J., Chen, N.-S., & Sung, Y.-T. (2017). Guest editorial: Learning analytics in technology enhanced language learning. Educational Technology & Society, 20(2), 158-160.
- Lim, C.P., & Tinio, V.L. (Eds.). (2018). Learning analytics for the global south. Foundation for Information Technology Education and Development. http://dl4d.org/portfolio-items/learning-analytics-for-the-global-south/
- Linden, K., Hicks, B., & Teakel, S. (2022, Sep. 1). Weathering the storm: Targeted and timely analytics to support disengaged students. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2022/9/weathering-the-storm-targeted-and-timely-analytics-to-support-disengaged-students
- Lohr, S. (2015). Data-ism: Inside the big data revolution. Oneworld.
- Lupton, D. (2017). Feeling your data: Touch and making sense of personal digital data. New Media & Society [early view].
- Lupton, D., & Williamson, B. (2017). The datafied child: The dataveillance of children and implications for their rights. New Media & Society, 19(5), 780-794.
- Marks, A., Al-Ali, M., & Rietsema, K. (2016). Learning management systems: A shift toward learning and academic analytics. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 11(4), 77-82. http://online-journals.org/index.php/i-jet/article/view/5419
- Márquez, L., Henríquez, V., Chevreux, H., Scheihing, E., & Guerra, J. (2024). Adoption of learning analytics in higher education institutions: A systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(2), 439-459. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13385
- Marzouk, Z., et al. (2016). What if learning analytics were based on learning science? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(6), 1-18. https://ajet.org.au/index.php/AJET/article/view/3058
- Mayer-Schonberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2013). Big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. John Murray.
- Mayer-Schonberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2014). Learning with big data: The future of education. Eamon Dolan.
- McKenney, S., & Mor, Y. (2015). Supporting teachers in data-informed educational design. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 265-279.
- Mor, Y., Ferguson, R., & Wasson, B. (2015). Editorial: Learning design, teacher inquiry into student learning and learning analytics: A call for action. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 221-229.
- Mottus, A., Kinshuk, Graf, S., & Chen, N.-S. (2015). Use of dashboards and visualization techniques to support teacher decision making. In Kinshuk & R. Huang (Eds.), Ubiquitous learning environments and technologies (pp.1-13). Springer.
- Neroni, J. (2015). The Adult Learning Open University Determinants (ALOUD) study: Biological and psychological factors associated with learning performance in distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(5), 953-960.
- Noble, S.U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York University Press.
- Oldridge, M. (2017, Jan. 17). Algorithmic literacy. Medium. https://medium.com/@MatthewOldridge/algorithmic-literacy-1d9b5f087142
- O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Allen Lane.
- Pangrazio, L. (2024). Data harms: The evidence against education data. Postdigital Science and Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-024-00468-2
- Pardo, A., et al. (2017). Using learning analytics to scale the provision of personalised feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology [early view].
- Pasquale, F. (2015). The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Harvard University Press.
- Pelletier, K., et al. (2022). 2022 EDUCAUSE Horizon report: Teaching and learning edition. https://bit.ly/3sNDHly
- Pelletier, K., et al. (2023). EDUCAUSE Horizon Report: Holistic Student Experience Edition. EDUCAUSE. https://library.educause.edu/resources/2023/10/2023-educause-horizon-report-holistic-student-experience-edition
- Persico, D., & Pozzi, F. (2015). Informing learning design with learning analytics to improve teacher inquiry. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 230-248.
- Raković, M., et al. (2023). Learning analytics and assessment: Emerging research trends, promises and future opportunities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(1), 10-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13301
- Reinders, H., & Lan, Y. J. (2021). Big data in language education and research. Language Learning & Technology, 25(1), 1–3. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/44746
- Siegel, E. (2016). Predictive analytics: The power to predict who will click, buy, lie, or die. John Wiley & Sons.
- Stephens-Davidowitz, S. (2017). Everybody lies: What the internet can tell us about who we really are. Bloomsbury.
- Tabuenca, B., Kalz, M., Drachsler, H., & Specht, M. (2015). Time will tell: The role of mobile learning analytics in self-regulated learning. Computers & Education, 89, 53-74.
- Tarnoff, B. (2017, Aug. 23). Silicon Valley siphons our data like oil. But the deepest drilling has just begun. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/aug/23/silicon-valley-big-data-extraction-amazon-whole-foods-facebook
- Thomas, M., Reinders, H. & Gelan, A. (2017). Learning analytics in online language learning: Challenges and future directions. In K. Hyland & L. Wong (Eds.) Faces of English. Routledge.
- UNESCO. (2022). Minding the data: Protecting learners’ privacy and security. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381494
- US Dept of Education. (2012). Enhancing teaching and learning through educational data mining and learning analytics: An issue brief. US Dept of Education. http://tech.ed.gov/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/edm-la-brief.pdf
- Wang, T., & Cheng, E. C. K. (2022). Towards a tripartite research agenda: A scoping review of artificial intelligence in education research. In E. C. K. Cheng, R. B. Koul, T. Wang & X. Yu (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education: Emerging technologies, models and applications. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol. 104. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7527-0_1
- Williamson, B. (2017). Who owns educational theory? Big data, algorithms and the expert power of education data science. E-learning and Digital Media [early view].
- Yu, Q., & Zhao, Y. (2015). The value and practice of learning analytics in computer assisted language learning. Studies in Literature and Language, 10(2), 90-96.
- Borup, J., Graham, C. R., Short, C., & Shin, J. K. (2022). Designing the new normal: Enable, engage, elevate, and extend student learning. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2022/1/designing-the-new-normal-enable-engage-elevate-and-extend-student-learning
- Kimmons, R., Graham, C. R., and West, R. E. (2020). The PICRAT model for technology integration in teacher preparation. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 1. https://citejournal.org/volume-20/issue-1-20/general/the-picrat-model-for-technology-integration-in-teacher-preparation/
- Ab Rashid, R., et al. (2016). Teachers’ informal learning via social networking technology. iJET, 11(10), 76-79.
- Couros, A. (2010). Developing personal learning networks for open and social learning. In G. Veletsianos (Ed.), Emerging technologies in distance education (pp. 109-128). AU Press. http://www.aupress.ca/books/120177/ebook/06_Veletsianos_2010-Emerging_Technologies_in_Distance_Education.pdf
- Greenhow, C., Staudt Willet, K. B., & Galvin, S. (2021). Inquiring tweets want to know: #Edchat supports for #RemoteTeaching during COVID-19. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52, 1434-1454. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13097
- Kearney, M., & Maher, D. (2019). Mobile learning in pre-service teacher education: Examining the use of professional learning networks. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1). https://ajet.org.au/index.php/AJET/article/view/4073
- Kearney, M., Maher, D., & Pham, L. (2019). Investigating pre-service teachers’ informally-developed online professional learning networks. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(1), 21-36. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4766
- Knutson, J. (2017, Jun. 25). From PLN to practice; Tips from 5 educators on personalizing your professional learning. Common Sense Education. https://www.commonsense.org/education/blog/from-pln-to-practice-tips-from-5-educators-on-personalizing-your-professional-learning
- Krutka, D. G., Carpenter, J. P., & Trust, T. (2017). Enriching professional learning networks: A framework for identification, reflection and intention. TechTrends, 61, 246-252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0141-5
- Nielsen, L. [and Her Personal Learning Network]. (2016). Supporting student personal learning networks. Berry St Books.
- Oddone, K., Hughes, H., & Lupton, M. (2019). Teachers as connected professionals: A model to support professional learning through personal learning networks. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(3), 102-120. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i4.4082
- Pegrum, M. (2015). VLEs or PLEs? Vignette in H. Reinders, Technology. In J.C Richards (Ed.), Key issues in language teaching (pp.634-664) [p.655]. Cambridge University Press.
- Pegrum, M. (ongoing). PLEs. Digital learning. http://wp.me/P8xJjA-1rZ
- Pegrum, M. (ongoing). PLNs. Digital learning. http://wp.me/P8xJjA-1s1
- Richter, E., Carpenter, J. P., Meyer, A., & Richter, D. (2022). Instagram as a platform for teacher collaboration and digital social support. Computers & Education, 190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104624
- Schrock, K. (ongoing). Creating your personal learning network. Kathy Schrock’s guide to everything. http://www.schrockguide.net/creating-your-pln.html
- Trust, T., Carpenter, J. P., & Krutka, D. G. (2017). Moving beyond silos: Professional learning networks in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 35(1), 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.06.001
- Trust, T., Krutka, D. G., & Carpenter, J. P. (2016). ‘Together we are better’: Professional learning networks for teachers. Computers & Education, 102, 15-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.06.007
- Veletsianos, G. (2016). Social media in academia: Networked scholars. Routledge.
- Biesta, G. (2022). World-centred education: A view for the present. Routledge. [NB: no direct reference to the postdigital but thematically highly relevant]
- Jandrić, P. (2023). History of the postdigital: Invitation for feedback. Postdigital Science and Education, 5, 493-508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-022-00345-w
- Knox, J. (2019). What does the ‘postdigital’ mean for education? Three critical perspectives on the digital, with implications for educational research and practice. Postdigital Science and Education, 1, 357-370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-019-00045-y
- Kuhn, C., Khoo, S. M., Czerniewicz, L., et al. (2023). Understanding digital inequality: A theoretical kaleidoscope. Postdigital Science and Education, 5, 894-932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-023-00395-8
- Pangrazio, L. (2024). Data harms: The evidence against education data. Postdigital Science and Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-024-00468-2
- Traxler, J., Connor, S., Hayes, S., & Jandric, P. (2022). Futures studies, mobilities, and the postdigital condition: Contention or complement. Postdigital Science and Education, 4, 494-518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00245-5
- Blackmon, S. J., & Major, C. H. (2023). Editorial: Balancing student privacy and technology integration in higher education: Engagement, encroachment and interstitial spaces. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54, 1539-1541. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13387
- Citron, D. K. (2023). Under their eye: The surveilled student. Stanford Law Review, 76. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4552267
- Costa, E. (2018). Affordances-in practice: An ethnographic critique of social media logic and context collapse. New Media & Society [online first].
- Ho, L. (2017, Jul. 31). Naked in the garden: Privacy and the next generation digital learning environment. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2017/7/naked-in-the-garden-privacy-and-the-next-generation-digital-learning-environment
- Kaye, D. (2019). Speech police: The global struggle to govern the internet. Columbia Global Reports.
- Lamoureux, E. L. (2016). Privacy, surveillance, and the new media you. Peter Lang.
- Solove, D. J., Hartzog, W. (2024, Jan. 5). Kafka in the age of AI and the futility of privacy as control Boston University Law Review 1021. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4685553
- Susi, M. (Ed.). (2019). Human rights, digital society and the law: A research companion. Routledge.
- Véliz, C. (2020). Privacy is power: Why and how you should take back control of your data. PRH.
- Acharya, B. N., & Rana, K. (2024). How students and teachers voyaged from physical classroom to Emergency Remote Teaching in COVID-19 crisis: A case of Nepal. E-Learning and Digital Media, 21(2), 125-140. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530231156166
- Crompton, H., Burke, D., Jordan, K., & Wilson, S. W. G. (2021). Learning with technology during emergencies: A systematic review of K-12 education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1554-1575. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13114
- Doucet, A., Netolicky, D., Timmers, K., & Tuscano, F. J. (2020). Thinking about pedagogy in an unfolding pandemic: An independent report on approaches to distance learning during COVID-19 school closures. https://issuu.com/educationinternational/docs/2020_research_covid-19_eng
- EdTech Hub. (2020, Sep.). The effect of Covid-19 on education in Africa and its implications for the use of technology: A survey of the experience and opinions of educators and technology specialists. https://www.elearning-africa.com/reports_surveys_COVID19.php
- Ferdig, R. E. & Pytash, K. E. (Eds.). (2021). What teacher educators should have learned from 2020. AACE. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/219088/
- Giannakis Koutina, C. (2022). Digital literacy in language education: The COVID-19 era of Cyprus. In C. Giannakis Koutina (Ed.), Transferring language learning and teaching from face-to-face to online settings (pp. 189-202). IGI Global.
- Greenhow, C., & Lewin, C. (2021). Online and blended learning: Contexts and conditions for education in an emergency. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1301-1305. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13130
- Greenhow, C., Staudt Willet, K. B., & Galvin, S. (2021). Inquiring tweets want to know: #Edchat supports for #RemoteTeaching during COVID-19. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52, 1434-1454. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13097
- Hartnett, M., Brown, C., Forbes, D., Gedera, D., & Datt, A. (2023). Enhanced or diminished attitudes: University students’ agency. Computers & Education, 198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104773
- Highman, L., & Kennedy, E. (2021). The age of online learning: Best practice in the evaluation of online education. University of Bath. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.31880.90881
- Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020, Mar. 27). The difference between Emergency Remote Teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
- Journal of Educators Online. (2023). Special edition: Post-Covid online teaching and learning research outcomes. https://www.thejeo.com/archive/2023_20_2
- Lowenthal, P. R., et al. (2020). Thinking beyond Zoom: Using asynchronous video to maintain connection and engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 383-391.
- MacKinnon, G., & MacLean, T. (2023). Emergency Remote Teaching: The challenges associated with a context of second language instruction. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 49(1). https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt28277
- Meinck, S., Fraillon, J., & Strietholt, R. (2022). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on education: International evidence from the Responses to Educational Disruption Survey (REDS). UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000380398
- Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2021). Beyond disruption: Technology enabled learning futures. 2020 edition of Mobile Learning Week. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000377753
- Moore, S., Trust, T., Lockee, B., Bond, A., & Hodges, C. (2021, Nov. 10). One year later . . . and counting: Reflections on Emergency Remote Teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2021/11/one-year-later-and-counting-reflections-on-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
- Moser, K. M., Wei, T., & Brenner, D. (2021). Remote teaching during COVID-19: Implications from a national survey of language educators. System, 97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102431
- O’Dea, X., & Stern, J. (2022). Editorial: Virtually the same?: Online higher education in the post Covid-19 era. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(3), 437-442. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13211
- Sarwari, K., Fawad Kakar, A., Golzar, J., & Abdullah Miri, M. (2022). Distance learning during COVID-19 in Afghanistan: Challenges and opportunities. E-learning and Digital Media, 19(2), 144-162. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530211044757
- Sytnykova, Y., Shlenova, M., Kyrpenko, Y., Kyrpenko, V., Konoplenko, N., & Hrynchenko, I. (2023). Teaching technologies online: Changes of experience in wartime in Ukraine. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 18(18), 165-176. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i18.40491
- Teräs, M., Suoranta, J., Teräs, H., & Curcher, M. (2020). Post-Covid-19 education and education technology ‘solutionism’: A seller’s market. Postdigitital Science and Education, 2, 863-878. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00164-x
- Thapaliya, M., Adhikari, S., & Rana, L. (2024). Opportunity in COVID-19 crisis: Moving away from chalk and talk to technology-integrated teaching in Nepalese higher education institutions. E-Learning and Digital Media, 21(1), 87-105. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530231153944
- Thomas, M. (2021). Epilogue: Critical project-based learning and moving forwards in the post-pandemic university. In M. Thomas & K. Yamazaki (Eds.), Project-based language learning and CALL: From virtual exchange to social justice (pp. 263-274). Equinox.
- Thomas, M., & Yamazaki, K. (2021). Introduction: Projects, pandemics and the re-positioning of digital language learning. In M. Thomas & K. Yamazaki (Eds.), Project-based language learning and CALL: From virtual exchange to social justice (pp. 1-18). Equinox.
- Traxler, J., Scott, H., Smith, M., & Hayes, S. (2021). Learning through the crisis: Helping decision-makers around the world use digital technology to combat the educational challenges produced by the current COVID-19 pandemic. EdTech Hub. https://docs.edtechhub.org/lib/CD9IAPFX/download/5N87EV2E/Traxler%20et%20al.%20-%202020%20-%20Learning%20through%20the%20crisis%20Helping%20decision-maker.pdf
- Trust, T., Carpenter, J. P., Krutka, D. G., & Kimmons, R. (2020). #RemoteTeaching and #RemoteLearning: Educator tweeting during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 151-159. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/216094/
- Banaji, S., & Bhat, R. (2022). Social media and hate. Routledge.
- Blank, G., & Lutz, C. (2018). Benefits and harms from internet use: A differentiated analysis of Great Britain. New Media & Society, 20(2), 618-640.
- Caballero-Julia, D., et al. (2024). Unpacking the relationship between screen use and educational outcomes in childhood: A systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105049
- Di Meco, L. (2023, Feb.). Monetizing misogyny: Gendered disinformation and the undermining of women’s rights and democracy globally. #ShePersisted. https://she-persisted.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/ShePersisted_MonetizingMisogyny.pdf
- Englander, E. K. (2020). 25 myths about cyberbullying. John Wiley & Sons.
- Evangelio, C., Rodríguez-González, P., Fernández-Río, J., & Gonzalez-Villora, S. (2022). Cyberbullying in elementary and middle school students: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104356
- Klein, J. (2019). Bullying: A reference handbook. ABC-CLIO.
- Livingstone, S., & Haddon, L. (Eds). (2009). Kids online. Opportunities and risks for children. Policy Press.
- Meeuwisse, R. (2017). Cybersecurity for beginners (2nd ed.). Cyber Simplicity.
- Moss, T. (2017, Aug. 14). Cyberhate and beyond: Tara Moss at The National Press Club. Tara Moss. http://taramoss.com/tara-moss-cyberhate-beyond-national-press-club/
- Ozkaya, E. (2019). Cybersecurity: The beginner’s guide. Packt.
- Patchin, J.W., & Hinduja, S. (2017). Digital self-harm among adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health [in press].
- Pegrum, M. (ongoing). Digital safety & wellness. Digital learning. http://wp.me/P8xJjA-1C
- Schaub Jr., G. (Ed.). (2018). Understanding cybersecurity: Emerging governance and strategy. Rowman & Littlefield.
- Schneier, B. (ongoing). Schneier on security. https://www.schneier.com/
- The US Surgeon General. (2023). Social media and youth mental health: The US Surgeon General’s advisory. https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/sg-youth-mental-health-social-media-advisory.pdf
- Weinstein, E., & James, C. (2022). Behind their screens: What teens are facing (and adults are missing). MIT Press.
- Cochrane, T., Narayan, V., & Antonczak, L. (2016). A framework for designing collaborative learning environments using mobile AR. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 27(4), 293-316.
- Common Sense Media. (2014). Introduction to the SAMR model. https://www.commonsensemedia.org/videos/introduction-to-the-samr-model
- Common Sense Media. (2015). Rethinking lesson activities with the SAMR model. https://www.graphite.org/users/kelly-mendoza/boards/rethinking-lesson-activities-with-the-samr-model
- Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2020). Mobile learning and pedagogical opportunities: A configurative systematic review of PreK-12 research using the SAMR framework. Computers & Education, 156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103945
- Hamilton, E. R., Rosenberg, J. M., & Akcaoglu, M. (2016). The Substitution Augmentation Modification Redefinition (SAMR) model: A critical review and suggestions for its use. TechTrends, 60(5), 433-441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0091-y
- Love, C. (2015, Jul. 23). SAMR: A model without evidence. Charlie Love.org. https://charlielove.org/?p=10025
- Magana, S. (2017). Disruptive classroom technologies: A framework for innovation in education. Corwin.
- Pegrum, M. (ongoing). Learning design. Digital learning. https://markpegrum.com/learning-design/
- Puentedura, R. R. (2011, Dec. 8). A brief introduction to TPCK and SAMR: Workshop slides. Ruben R. Puentedura’s weblog. http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2011/12/08/BriefIntroTPCKSAMR.pdf
- Puentedura, R. (2012, Sep. 14). Building upon SAMR. Presentation at Presbyterian Ladies’ College, Perth. [Overview by M. Pegrum at: http://elanguage.edublogs.org/2012/09/15/building-upon-samr-ruben-puentedura/]
- Puentedura, R. (2014). SAMR and Bloom’s Taxonomy: Assembling the puzzle. Common Sense Graphite.
https://www.graphite.org/blog/samr-and-blooms-taxonomy-assembling-the-puzzle - Bauman, Z., & Lyon, D. (2013). Liquid surveillance: A conversation. Polity.
- Berners-Lee, T. (2017, Mar. 12). I invented the web. Here are three things we need to change to save it. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/mar/11/tim-berners-lee-web-inventor-save-internet
- Botsman, R. (2017, Oct. 21). Big data meets Big Brother as China moves to rate its citizens. Wired. http://www.wired.co.uk/article/chinese-government-social-credit-score-privacy-invasion
- Cao, Y., et al. (2018) Orderliness predicts academic performance: Behavioural analysis on campus lifestyle. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 15. http://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2018.0210
- Cao Y., Gao J., & Zhou T. (2019) Orderliness of campus lifestyle predicts academic performance: A case study in Chinese university. In H. Baumeister & C. Montag (Eds.), Digital phenotyping and mobile sensing: Studies in neuroscience, psychology and behavioral economics. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31620-4_8
- Cheney-Lippold, J. (2017). We are data: Algorithms and the making of our digital selves. New York University Press.
- Chun, R. (2018, Apr.). China’s new frontiers in dystopian tech. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/04/big-in-china-machines-that-scan-your-face/554075/
- Citron, D. K. (2023). Under their eye: The surveilled student. Stanford Law Review, 76. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4552267
- Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). The costs of connection: How data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford University Press.
- Crawford, K. (2021). The atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. Yale University Press.
- Dwyer, T. (2020). Privacy from your mobile devices? Algorithmic accountability, surveillance capitalism, and the accumulation of personal data. In R. Ling, L. Fortunati, G. Goggin, S. S. Lim & Y. Li (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of mobile communication and society (pp. 547-562). Oxford University Press.
- Electronic Frontier Foundation [US]. (ongoing). http://www.eff.org/
- Electronic Frontiers Australia. (ongoing). http://www.efa.org.au/
- ELI (EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative). (2018). 7 things you should know about … GDPR. https://library.educause.edu/resources/2018/5/7-things-you-should-know-about-gdpr
- Ess, C. (2020). Digital media ethics (3rd ed.). Polity.
- Geiger M., Wilhelm O. (2019). Computerized facial emotion expression recognition. In H. Baumeister & C. Montag (Eds.), Digital phenotyping and mobile sensing: Studies in neuroscience, psychology and behavioral economics (pp. 31-44). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31620-4_3
- Global Voices. (ongoing). http://www.globalvoicesonline.org/
- Harcourt, B.E. (2015). Exposed: Desire and disobedience in the digital age. Harvard University Press.
- Hargittai, E., & Marwick, A. (2016). ‘What can I really do?’: Explaining the privacy paradox with online apathy. International Journal of Communication, 10, 3737-3757.
- Hayama, T., Odate, H. & Ishida, N. (2020). Classification of student’s in-class behavior using a desktop pressure sensor. International Journal on E-Learning, 19(4), 383-395.
- Hvistendahl, M. (2017, Dec. 14). Inside China’s vast new experiment in social ranking. Wired. https://www.wired.com/story/age-of-social-credit/
- Knox, J. (2019). What does the ‘postdigital’ mean for education? Three critical perspectives on the digital, with implications for educational research and practice. Postdigital Science and Education, 1, 357-370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-019-00045-y
- Kostka, G. (2019). China’s social credit systems and public opinion: Explaining high levels of approval. New Media & Society, 21(7), 1565-1593. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819826402
- Lamoureux, E. L. (2016). Privacy, surveillance, and the new media you. Peter Lang.
- Lawrence, C. (2017, Jun. 1). Facial recognition tech makes it official: There is no privacy anymore. ReadWrite. https://readwrite.com/2017/06/01/facial-recognition-tech-privacy-dl1/
- Lessig, L. (2008). Remix: Making art and commerce thrive in the hybrid economy. Bloomsbury.
- Li, J., Shen, Y., Dai, W., & Fan, B. (2022). Design of student management system based on smart campus and wearable devices. In E. C. K. Cheng, R. B. Koul, T. Wang & X. Yu (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education: Emerging technologies, models and applications. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, 104. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7527-0_11
- Lim, H., Kim, S., Chung, K.-M., Lee, K., Kim, T., & Heo, J. (2022). Is college students’ trajectory associated with academic performance? Computers & Education, 178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104397
- Liu, S., Liu, S., Liu, Z., Peng, X., & Yang, Z. (2022). Automated detection of emotional and cognitive engagement in MOOC discussions to predict learning achievement. Computers & Education, 181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104461
- MacKinnon, R. (2012). Consent of the networked: The worldwide struggle for internet freedom. Basic Books.
- Mejias, U. A. (2020, Sep. 8). Why we need a non-aligned technologies movement. Al Jazeera. https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/aligned-technologies-movement-200907090048112.html
- Pasquale, F. (2015). The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Harvard University Press.
- Pomerantz, J. (2015). Metadata. MIT Press.
- Saul, R., & Burkholder, C. (2019) Schooling futures in tension: On competing discourses at a technology education summit. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 16(3), 299-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/15505170.2019.1611679
- Schneier, B. (2015). Data and Goliath: The hidden battles to collect your data and control your world. W. W. Norton.
- Selwyn, N., Hillman, T., Bergviken Rensfeldt, A., & Perrotta, C. (2021). Digital technologies and the automation of education – Key questions and concerns. Postdigital Science and Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00263-3
- Silverman, J. (2015). Terms of service: Social media and the price of constant connection. Harper Perennial.
- Skidelsky, R. (2023). The machine age: An idea, a history, a warning. Allen Lane.
- Turow, J. (2021). The voice catchers: How marketers listen in to exploit your feelings, your privacy, and your wallet. Yale University Press.
- UNESCO. (2022). Minding the data: Protecting learners’ privacy and security. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381494
- Wachter-Boettcher, S. (2017). Technically wrong: Sexist apps, biased algorithms, and other threats of toxic tech. W. W. Norton.
- Yao, H., Lian, D., Cao, Y., Wu, Y., & Zhou, T. (2019). Predicting academic performance for college students: A campus behaviour perspective. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.06726v1
- Yu, H., Zhang, G., Liu, J., & Li, K. (2019). Intelligent knowledge service system based on depression monitoring of college students. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(12), 71-84. https://online-journals.org/index.php/i-jet/article/view/10702
- Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the frontier of power. PublicAffairs.
- Magana, S. (2017). Disruptive classroom technologies: A framework for innovation in education. Corwin.
- Magana, S. (2017). Imagining the future. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RTQjEPmex8E
- Magana, S. (2019). Disrupting low-impact technology use: Aligning visible learning and the T3 framework for innovation. Corwin. https://maganaeducation.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Magana_Disrupting-Low-Impact-Technology-Use_FINAL.pdf
- Angeli, C., Valanides, N., & Christodoulou, A. (2016). Theoretical considerations of technological pedagogical content knowledge. In M.C. Herring, M.J. Koehler & P. Mishra (Eds.), Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for Educators (pp.11-33). Routledge.
- Blackwell, C.K., Lauricella, A.R., & Wartella, E. (2016). The influence of TPACK contextual factors on early childhood educators’ tablet computer use. Computers & Education, 98, 57-69.
- Brianza, E., Schmid, M., Tondeur, J., & Petko, D. (2022). Situating TPACK: A systematic literature review of context as a domain of knowledge. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 22(4), 707-753. https://citejournal.org/volume-22/issue-4-22/general/situating-tpack-a-systematic-literature-review-of-context-as-a-domain-of-knowledge
- Chai, C.S., Tan, L., Deng, F., & Koh, J.H.L. (2017). Examining pre-service teachers’ design capacities for web-based 21st century new culture of learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(2), 129-142. https://ajet.org.au/index.php/AJET/article/viewFile/3013/1419
- Chua Reyes Jr., V. et al. (2017). Integrating ICT into teacher education programs from a TPACK perspective: Exploring perceptions of university lecturers. Computers & Education, 115, 1-19.
- Dalal, M., Archambault, L., & Shelton, C. (2021). Fostering the growth of TPACK among
international teachers of developing nations through a cultural exchange program. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5964 - Deng, G., & Zhang, J. (2023). Technological pedagogical content ethical knowledge (TPCEK): The development of an assessment instrument for pre-service teachers. Computers & Education, 197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104740
- Drummond, A., & Sweeney, T. (2016). Can an objective measure of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) supplement existing TPACK measures? British Journal of Educational Technology [early view].
- Herring, M.C., Koehler, M.J., & Mishra, P. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for educators. Routledge.
- Istenic Starcic, A., Cotic, M., Solomonides, I., & Volk, M. (2016). Engaging preservice primary and preprimary school teachers in digital storytelling for the teaching and learning of mathematics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(1), 29-50.
- Joo, Y. J., Park, S., & Lim, E. (2018). Factors influencing preservice teachers’ intention to use technology: TPACK, teacher self-efficacy, and Technology Acceptance Model. Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 48-59. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26458506
- Kali, Y., et al. (2019). Teaching expertise reconsidered: The Technology, Pedagogy, Content and Space (TPeCS) knowledge framework. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2162-2177. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12847
- Kavanoz, S., GülruYüksel, H., & Özcan, E. (2015). Pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy perceptions on Web Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Computers & Education, 85, 94-101.
- Kimmons, R. (2015). Examining TPACK’s theoretical future. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 23(1), 53-77.
- Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Ed.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp. 3-29). Routledge.
- Li, G., Sun, Z., & Jee, Y. (2019). The more technology the better? A comparison of teacher student interaction in high and low technology use elementary EFL classrooms in China. System, 84, 24-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.05.003
- Magana, S. (2017). Disruptive classroom technologies: A framework for innovation in education. Corwin.
- Mishra, P., Warr, M., & Islam, R. (2023). TPACK in the age of ChatGPT and generative AI. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 39(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2023.2247480
- Puentedura, R. R. (2011, Dec. 8). A brief introduction to TPCK and SAMR: Workshop slides. Ruben R. Puentedura’s weblog. http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2011/12/08/BriefIntroTPCKSAMR.pdf
- Rahimi, M., & Pourshahbaz, S. (2019). English as a foreign language teachers’ TPACK: Emerging research and opportunities. IGI Global.
- Saubern, R., Henderson, M., Heinrich, E., & Redmond, P. (2020). TPACK – time to reboot? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6378
- Schmid, M., Brianza, E., Mok, S. Y., & Petko, D. (2024). Running in circles: A systematic review of reviews on technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105024
- TPACK.org. (ongoing). http://www.tpack.org/
- Lowenthal, P. R., et al. (2020). Thinking beyond Zoom: Using asynchronous video to maintain connection and engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 383-391.
- Noetel, M., Griffith, S., Delaney, O., Sanders, T., Parker, P., del Pozo Cruz, B., & Lonsdale, C. (2021). Video improves learning in higher education: A systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 91(2), 204-236. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654321990713
- Pi, Z., Liu, W., Ling, H., Zhang, X., & Li, X. (2023). Does an instructor’s facial expressions override their body gestures in video lectures? Computers & Education, 193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104679
- Sondermann, C., & Merkt, M. (2023). Like it or learn from it: Effects of talking heads in educational videos. Computers & Education, 193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104675
- Truss, A., McBride, K., Porter, H., Anderson, V., Stilwell, G., Philippou, C., & Taggart, A. (2024). Learner engagement with instructor-generated video. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(5), 2192-2211. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13450
Global South (Developing world)
See also: Publications on Mobile Learning.
Hybrid learning (Blended learning/Hyflex learning)
Learning analytics (Big data)
PICRAT
PLNs (Personal/professional learning networks/environments/PLEs)
Postdigital
Privacy
Remote teaching (Emergency remote teaching/ERT)
Safety
SAMR
Surveillance (Educational surveillance/Tracking/Censorship)
T3
TPACK
Video
Last update: November 2024.
LATEST ON INSTAGRAM
Latest on Edublogs
- Gen AI takes front stage August 29, 2024GloCALL Conference Hanoi, Vietnam 22-24 August, 2024 Unsurprisingly, the 2024 GloCALL Conference in Hanoi was dominated by discussions and debates about generative AI, as educators and educational institutions seek to come to terms with its uses and challenges. While there was a general acknowledgement that genAI is having and will continue to have a major […]