
Search engines are relatively old services, originally set up to support information retrieval on web 1.0. However, search tools moved in a web 2.0 direction as they became more user-centred and personalised. More recently, they have moved in a web 3.0 direction with the continued development of algorithmically driven personalised search and, from 2023, the rollout of AI technology as seen in Microsoft’s Bing/Copilot (incorporating OpenAI’s GPT large language model, or LLM) and Google’s Gemini (formerly Bard; incorporating Google’s own Gemini LLM); for further details, see the section on AI and future search customisation towards the end of this page. Search is of course available on mobile devices, with major search engines downloadable as apps, and hence has some links with mobile learning.
Search engines are essential to help users find materials in the vast ocean of online content. Search on both desktop/laptop computers and mobile devices is dominated by Google, with other major search engines including Yahoo! and Baidu (百度). There are also specialised search services worth knowing about, as these may sometimes return more appropriate results than the major search engines. In general, more customisation of search has become possible, giving users more control over search parameters. Much more automated personalisation of search has also become evident, as the major search engines have worked towards ensuring that personally relevant, time-sensitive, context-sensitive information is provided to users; but serious concerns have been raised over search engines determining what is relevant and useful to individuals based on their tracking of those individuals’ browsing habits and online associations.
While there is no doubt that students need to search for information online for a variety of purposes, it has become evident that many students lack the requisite digital literacy skills in this area. This has resulted in programmes at all levels of the education system to help students acquire:
-
- the search literacy to conduct effective keyword searches, which, with the shift to AI-based search, is likely to merge with the prompt literacy needed to interact effectively with AI chatbots and agents
- the information literacy and critical literacy to evaluate information and differentiate reliable from unreliable content, especially in the context of the proliferation of misinformation, disinformation and fake news across the internet in recent years
- the tagging literacy to keep track of, categorise and organise content found online
Key innovations in search customisation and personalisation are outlined below, along with examples.
Customisation > Even prior to the advent of AI-based search, major search engines offered their own customisation tools (see for example Google Advanced Search), which has led to the disappearance of many specialised search services over recent years. However, there are still a number that remain active and allow very focused searches, as seen below.
| SERVICE | SPECIALISATION |
| 2lingual | bilingual content |
| BASE | academic content |
| CC Search | Creative Commons content |
| Dogpile | metasearch (compiles results from other search engines) |
| Google Scholar | academic content |
| Kiddle | child-friendly content |
| Openverse | openly licensed content (incl. Creative Commons content) |
| Refseek | academic content |
| Trove | Australian historical and governmental content |
| WolframAlpha | maths & science content (including computed answers) |
| ZabaSearch | people |
For more options, see Wikipedia’s List of Search Engines. To create your own fully customised web search, try Google’s Programmable Search Engine. To compare global search trends for different terms, check out Google Trends.
Personalisation > Personalisation of search (though arguably individualisation may be a better term, as it lacks the humanistic overtones of personalisation) is the area where we have recently seen the greatest developments. It is increasingly the case that the search context is defined in relation to the individual doing the searching, and the other people to whom that individual is connected. Search results are thus determined by algorithms which tailor the results to individuals on the basis of information tracked or inferred about them as a result of past searches, online activities, and online connections. The consequence is that two individuals searching for exactly the same topic using exactly the same terms in a search engine like Google may find that they receive very different results. Indeed, the ultimate aim of personalised search is seemingly to obviate the need for searching at all, with search engines becoming more like prediction engines which anticipate users’ needs. A further move in the direction of personalisation can be anticipated as AI-based search becomes more common. Interestingly, more manual contextualisation options can also be seen in the growing ability of users to provide detailed contextual information when asking questions of AI chatbots.
Automated personalisation also plays a major role in determining what content is seen by social media users in their feeds. In some ways, social networking, microblogging and social sharing services partly eliminate the need for searching, because relevant content is already preselected for users. As such, social media platforms may be seen as something of a threat to the dominance of search engines in accessing online content.
The key issue for educators is that when search engines or social media services tailor news and results to individual users, the range of information received by an individual becomes ever narrower. To the extent that education is about broadening rather than narrowing students’ horizons, this is a concern. For a statement about the dangers of ‘filter bubbles’, see Eli Pariser’s TED Talk Beware Online ‘Filter Bubbles’, which dates from 2011 but has become even more relevant in the intervening years.
AI and future search customisation and personalisation > Further customisation and personalisation, but also further issues over tracking of individuals, are likely to accompany the ongoing rollout of general AI-powered search services like Google (whose ‘AI mode’ defaults to Gemini, and which, even without this mode selected, often presents an AI summary above lists of search results) and Microsoft’s Bing/Copilot. Other AI-powered search options include the Opera browser, while many AI chatbots such as ChatGPT and Perplexity now have live web access and can thus also search the web. In other words, we are beginning to see a fusion of search and generative AI within the larger web 3.0 space, with the concomitant danger that users will simply accept answers based on statistical linguistic probabilities (which drive LLMs) rather than engaging in their own evaluation of results. In this context, the digital literacies mentioned above – like search literacy, prompt literacy, information literacy and critical literacy – become all the more crucial.
Last update: February 2026.

Latest on Edublogs
- AI literacy to the fore October 7, 2025XXIIIrd International CALL Conference Brisbane, Australia 3-5 October, 2025 As expected, the International CALL Conference had a strong focus on integrating generative AI effectively into education, entailing the need for both educators and students to develop their AI literacy. Given the conference theme of Inclusive CALL, many papers also discussed the ambivalent role played by genAI […]

